Thursday, June 19, 2008

Religious commission criticizes Saudi textbooks

An Islamic academy in Northern Virginia plans to revise before the new school year textbooks that reportedly advocate violence against non-Muslims and some Muslims, a school spokesman has said.

The Islamic Saudi Academy's head of Muslim teachings made the comment to the Cybercast News Service (CNS News) June 17, less than a week after a United States panel called for the reforms. The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) issued an eight-page report June 11 on the curriculum, citing some examples of passages it said promote violence and intolerance.

Among the examples are statements from two 12th-grade textbooks used at the academy, which is operated by the Saudi Arabian government:

-- One book says a Muslim may kill an apostate (a Muslim who has converted), an adulterer or a person who has intentionally murdered an Islamic believer, according to USCIRF. Allah, the text says, "prohibits killing the soul that God has forbidden (to kill) unless for just cause...." Just cause is explained in the book as "unbelief after belief, adultery, and killing an inviolable believer intentionally," USCIRF reported.



  1. Anonymous5:18 PM

    Islam is the destroyer of all that is beautiful, spiritual, gentle, innocent and vulnerable. Most religions have a softer feminine aspect (eg Virgin Mary, Arya Tara) but all trace of the feminine has been eradicated from Islam to give something which is consequently only half human.

    Predatory and domineering, Islam is a hyper-masculine barbarian tribal warrior cult that glories in murder, mutilation, rape, genocide, destruction and anarchy.

    Islam delenda est!

  2. Anonymous5:19 PM


    The UN definition:

    It described sexual violence as "a tactic of war to humiliate, dominate, instill fear in, disperse and/or forcibly relocate civilian members of a community or ethnic group".

    Clearly what the Muslim male is doing when he rapes a Kufr female is an act of war because the intentions are precisely as above.

    How does this ruling fit the situation in the UK

    1) The Muslim wishes to humiliate and dominate the Kufr
    2) The Muslim wishes to instill fear in the community
    3) the Muslim create Muslim only areas by forcing people out of those areas by various means, including rape
    4) The British are an ethnic group.

    Just how do we respond to this act of war, do we go to the UN, do we go to the Police, do we go to the Government, somehow I do not think any of those approaches would yield much fruit.

    More at