She tried to call the police, but the kidnappers then took away her cellphone, and threatened her again. After driving for a while the men stopped in a wood, and claimed that she owed them 15.000 NOK (about 2000 US$). They told her if she did not get the money, they would chop off her arm, using an axe they showed her they had. She claimed she had never seen them before, and that she did not owe them any money.
They handcuffed her, and after having held her captive for several hours the kidnappers decided to phone Camilla’s father, and demand that he get the money. During the phonecall they told her father that they “had not done anything to her yet”. Her father promised to get the money, but said he needed some time.
After having held Camilla captive through the night, the kidnappers met with her father to get the money and release Camilla. In the meantime her father had contacted the police, and as soon as the girl was safe a SWAT-team moved in and arrested the kidnappers. At a medical check after her ordeal Camilla learned that she was pregnant.
The kidnappers had kicked her hard in the stomach, so during the pregnancy she was afraid something wrong might have happened to the child. However, on January 15 she gave birth to a healthy baby girl. Camilla was of course relieved, but her worries are not over. She is afraid the kidnappers might try to hurt her again. Only one of them was sentenced to prison (6 months). Two others only got some hours of community service, while the last one, a boy of Pakistani origin, remains at large.
We knew it of course, but VG prefers to bury this vital aspect of the case deep down in the text of their story, which of course, after all, is better than hiding it completely like the Norwegian press used to do. The important point here is not really the Pakistani origin, it is the muslim origin. There is only one group of people in Norway which considers as their prophet and role model a man who himself practiced abduction and ransom, only one group whose (un)holy book authorizes such actions.
VG goes on to report that last Friday four men were convicted for the kidnapping. All the involved had previous convictions for robbery, violence and drug-related crime. Three of the men (18 and 19 years old) only got 180 hours of community service, because the court considered they had had a difficult childhood. A 23 year old man which the court considered to be the key man responsible, and who has several previous convictions for serious crime, was sentenced to 6 months in prison.
VG seems somewhat upset over the very light sentences applied in the case. There is really no reason for that, not as long as the religious freedom in Norway also protects a barbaric cult founded by the biggest disgrace to mankind which ever walked on the earth: The “prophet” Mohammed. The pervert rantings he left behind as islams’s “holy book” clearly not only authorizes, but even commands, muslims to act in this manner. It says 047.004
“Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers (in fight), smite at their necks; At length, when ye have thoroughly subdued them, bind a bond firmly (on them): thereafter (is the time for) either generosity or ransom.”
By handcuffing their victim it appears these true followers of Muhammed (pigshit be upon him) took great care to follow the Koran to the best of their ability. Now, some people will argue that the above verse in the Koran only applies in war. Sure, but as the Koran also clearly states in 009.029 there is a permanent state of war between muslims and non-muslims:
“Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.”
So there is really no reason to be upset over the light sentences applied. What there is reason to be upset about is that a pervert cult condoning kidnapping, rape and murder is protected by the freedom of religion. Its about as stupid as using legislation designed to protect animals from unnecessary suffering to protect the HIV-virus.
Meanwhile, in neighbouring Sweden a somewhat similar case is unfolding. A 13 year old girl was gang-raped by four men of muslim origin. They have, however, been acquitted of rape because the girl allegedly was too drunk to resist, and according to Swedish legislation, if there is no resistance there is no rape. Why there was no resistance seems to be beside the point. The girl does not have the money to fund an appeal to the Swedish Supreme Court. However, it appears that the case has upset common Swedes to an extent which has caused them to start collecting money to fund the appeal.
Entire article here.