(Excerpt)
Islam, like Fascism and Communism, is a totalitarian ideology. It has as much to do with politics as with religion, has more silly rules than a game of Calvin Ball, has sent more people to their deaths than a thousand Dachaus and Treblinkas, and is as violent as a triple-overtime grudge match winner-take-all between Godzilla and King Kong.
The similarities between Mohammed and Hitler are striking.
Both were angry, violent and vengeful men who imposed rigid semi-barbaric, pseudo-religious systems on the gullible, the greedy, the fearful and the criminal.
There was no mass media in the 7th Century to expose Mohammed for what he was.
One or two unread poets were not enough. On the other hand, Hitler had to contend with the printed word, the newsreel camera and eventually Winston Churchill.
The shelf life of a 20th Century dictator was much less than it was in Mohammed’s time. The Prophets followers had centuries to do as they pleased. There was no Walter Cronkite to say, “You are there;” no muckraking journalist counting corpses in back alleys; no Mike Wallace to shove a microphone into the face of barbarism—make that a young Mike Wallace.
If Mohammed had thrived during the 1930s instead of the 7th Century he would have suffered the same fate as Hitler—it would have been 30 years and out. In the 1990s he would have been another David Koresh, a crazy man exposed just in time.
Did George Bush hit a new low when he referred to Islamic-fascists? No, but it was a waste of time and energy.
He should have called them what they are—not Islamo-fascists but Muslim terrorists for only the truth will set them free.
George W. Bush, unfortunately, is not yet ready for that.
Entire Article Here.
No comments:
Post a Comment