Posts
mosquewatch
Stumble It!
Book 041, Number 6981:
Ibn 'Umar reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: You will fight against the Jews and you will kill them until even a stone would say: Come here, Muslim, there is a Jew (hiding himself behind me) ; kill him.
Book 041, Number 6982:
Ubaidullah has reported this hadith with this chain of transmitters (and the Words are):" There is a Jew behind me."
Book 041, Number 6983:
Abdullah b. 'Umar reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: You and the Jews would fight against one another until a stone would say: Muslim, here is a Jew behind me; come and kill him.
Book 041, Number 6984:
Abdullah b. 'Umar reported that Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: The Jews will fight against you and you will gain victory over them until the stone would say: Muslim, here is a Jew behind me; kill him.
Book 041, Number 6985:
Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: The last hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him; but the tree Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews.
SOURCE HERE
Monday, July 31, 2006
Islam the big lie "Killing women and children is forbidden in war."
Chapter 9: PERMISSIBILITY OF KILLING WOMEN AND CHILDREN IN THE NIGHT RAIDS, PROVIDED IT IS NOT DELIBERATE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Book 019, Number 4321:
It is reported on the authority of Sa'b b. Jaththama that the Prophet of Allah (may peace be upon him), when asked about the women and children of the polytheists being killed during the night raid, said: They are from them.
Source here From this, read and understand.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Book 019, Number 4322:
It is narrated by Sa'b b. Jaththama that he said (to the Holy Prophet): Messenger of Allah, we kill the children of the polytheists during the night raids. He said: They are from them.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Book 019, Number 4323:
Sa'b b. Jaththama has narrated that the Prophet (may peace be upon him) asked: What about the children of polytheists killed by the cavalry during the night raid? He said: They are from them.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Book 019, Number 4321:
It is reported on the authority of Sa'b b. Jaththama that the Prophet of Allah (may peace be upon him), when asked about the women and children of the polytheists being killed during the night raid, said: They are from them.
Source here From this, read and understand.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Book 019, Number 4322:
It is narrated by Sa'b b. Jaththama that he said (to the Holy Prophet): Messenger of Allah, we kill the children of the polytheists during the night raids. He said: They are from them.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Book 019, Number 4323:
Sa'b b. Jaththama has narrated that the Prophet (may peace be upon him) asked: What about the children of polytheists killed by the cavalry during the night raid? He said: They are from them.
An open challenge, prove me wrong I'll shut the blog down.
From idiotblogwatch.blogspot Monday, July 31, 2006
I am not afraid of my critics, I relish them. My responses are in red text.
Mosquewatch - By An American Idiot
This blog http://mosquewatch.blogspot.com/ has to be my first entry in Idiot Blog Watch. This is a classic example of a naive, simplistic, biased, blogger. There are some quite astounding statements in this blog, for example, he picks this story "Jordan: MOM KILLS DAUGHTER WITH AX: honor killing."
This may be true,(MAYBE TRUE ? IT IS TRUE NO MAYBE ABOUT IT. ) but he implies that all Muslims are like this.(Let me guess , just another "RANDOM ACT" RIGHT?) The fact is they're not. I could find a story everyday of an American killing another American for some petty reason,(NOT IN THE NAME OF ALLAH YOU WON'T) but that doesn't mean all Americans would kill another American for some petty reason.
This blogger is putting all Muslims in the same category.(NO I'M NOT, YOU EVIDENTLY HAVE NOT READ THE WHOLE BLOG) This shows a complete lack of understanding of other cultures and religions. Not surprisingly this blogger believes in a different religion than Islam. (SO WHAT?)
The more I read this blog, the more I wonder about the sanity of this blogger. To say this blogger is paranoid is an understatement.
Here is another exert: "I don't know why all the anguish over caring for the Muslim boys and girls being killed in the present war.Muslims don't care about the boys and girls.They have schools where they teach neurotic lessons to their own offspring. There instructors teach them in play acting how to behead an infidel." (THAT IS A TRUE STATEMENT, NOT A LIE )
This is pretty much the basic content of this blog. Insane rants and untruths (WHAT UNTRUTHS?) about a religion and people he obviously doesn't like.( I DON'T HATE MUSLIMS, THE TEACHINGS OF THE KORAN LEAD TO TERROR) This sort of statement is not true. Most Muslims do care about their children. Most Muslims, like Christians, or Jews, or Atheists would not send their children to a school where they teach them how to behead someone.
He has exerts from the Koran and compares them to exerts from the Bible, but what he fails to point out is that the Koran, like the Bible, is open to interpretation.
He uses the worst possible interpretations of the Koran and claims that this is how all Muslims interpret it.
For your information, I am not a Muslim, in fact I don't believe in God, so I'm not sticking up for Muslims because I'm a Muslim. (THEN WHAT ARE YOU ATHIEST OR MUSLIM?)I'm not even sticking up for Muslims, I'm just pointing out an Idiot Blog, that's written by a narrow minded, paranoid blogger.
Please read it for yourself, you will be amazed.
Sir also read http://truthinconviction.us/weblog.php I post Pator Swank's articles because I agree with them.
NEXT TIME ATTACK THE ISSUE NOT THE PERSON :) BEST WISHES TO YOU AND YOUR FAMILY.
Jeff Davis
I am not afraid of my critics, I relish them. My responses are in red text.
Mosquewatch - By An American Idiot
This blog http://mosquewatch.blogspot.com/ has to be my first entry in Idiot Blog Watch. This is a classic example of a naive, simplistic, biased, blogger. There are some quite astounding statements in this blog, for example, he picks this story "Jordan: MOM KILLS DAUGHTER WITH AX: honor killing."
This may be true,(MAYBE TRUE ? IT IS TRUE NO MAYBE ABOUT IT. ) but he implies that all Muslims are like this.(Let me guess , just another "RANDOM ACT" RIGHT?) The fact is they're not. I could find a story everyday of an American killing another American for some petty reason,(NOT IN THE NAME OF ALLAH YOU WON'T) but that doesn't mean all Americans would kill another American for some petty reason.
This blogger is putting all Muslims in the same category.(NO I'M NOT, YOU EVIDENTLY HAVE NOT READ THE WHOLE BLOG) This shows a complete lack of understanding of other cultures and religions. Not surprisingly this blogger believes in a different religion than Islam. (SO WHAT?)
The more I read this blog, the more I wonder about the sanity of this blogger. To say this blogger is paranoid is an understatement.
Here is another exert: "I don't know why all the anguish over caring for the Muslim boys and girls being killed in the present war.Muslims don't care about the boys and girls.They have schools where they teach neurotic lessons to their own offspring. There instructors teach them in play acting how to behead an infidel." (THAT IS A TRUE STATEMENT, NOT A LIE )
This is pretty much the basic content of this blog. Insane rants and untruths (WHAT UNTRUTHS?) about a religion and people he obviously doesn't like.( I DON'T HATE MUSLIMS, THE TEACHINGS OF THE KORAN LEAD TO TERROR) This sort of statement is not true. Most Muslims do care about their children. Most Muslims, like Christians, or Jews, or Atheists would not send their children to a school where they teach them how to behead someone.
He has exerts from the Koran and compares them to exerts from the Bible, but what he fails to point out is that the Koran, like the Bible, is open to interpretation.
He uses the worst possible interpretations of the Koran and claims that this is how all Muslims interpret it.
For your information, I am not a Muslim, in fact I don't believe in God, so I'm not sticking up for Muslims because I'm a Muslim. (THEN WHAT ARE YOU ATHIEST OR MUSLIM?)I'm not even sticking up for Muslims, I'm just pointing out an Idiot Blog, that's written by a narrow minded, paranoid blogger.
Please read it for yourself, you will be amazed.
Sir also read http://truthinconviction.us/weblog.php I post Pator Swank's articles because I agree with them.
NEXT TIME ATTACK THE ISSUE NOT THE PERSON :) BEST WISHES TO YOU AND YOUR FAMILY.
Jeff Davis
Surah 8:39 “Fight them until all opposition ends and all submit to Allah.”
No thanks needed for the plug to you FIRST POST, in your FIRST BLOG. :) :)
Monthly Jihad Report : June, 2006
Jihad Attacks: 212
Dead Bodies: 762
Critically Injured: 1201
Surah 2:244 “Fight in Allah’s Cause, and know that Allah hears and knows all.”
Surah 2:246 “He said: ‘Would you refrain from fighting if fighting were prescribed for you?’ They said: ‘How could we refuse to fight in Allah’s Cause?’”
Surah 8:39 “Fight them until all opposition ends and all submit to Allah.”
Surah 8:65 “O Prophet, urge the faithful to fight. If there are twenty among you with determination they will vanquish two hundred; if there are a hundred then they will slaughter a thousand unbelievers, for the infidels are a people devoid of understanding.”
Surah 8:73 “The unbelieving infidels are allies. Unless you (Muslims) aid each other (fighting as one united block to make Allah’s religion victorious), there will be confusion and mischief. Those who accepted Islam, left their homes to fight in Allah’s Cause (al-Jihad), as well as those who give them asylum, shelter, and aid—these are (all) Believers: for them is pardon and bountiful provision (in Paradise).”
Surah 9:5 “Fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, take them captive, harass them, lie in wait and ambush them using every stratagem of war.”
Surah 9:14 “Fight them and Allah will punish them by your hands, lay them low, and cover them with shame. He will help you over them.”
Surah 9:29 “Fight those who do not believe until they all surrender, paying the protective tax* in submission.” *protection tax is called the "jizyah" tax.
Surah 9:123 “Fight the unbelievers around you, and let them find harshness in you.”
Dead Bodies: 762
Critically Injured: 1201
Surah 2:244 “Fight in Allah’s Cause, and know that Allah hears and knows all.”
Surah 2:246 “He said: ‘Would you refrain from fighting if fighting were prescribed for you?’ They said: ‘How could we refuse to fight in Allah’s Cause?’”
Surah 8:39 “Fight them until all opposition ends and all submit to Allah.”
Surah 8:65 “O Prophet, urge the faithful to fight. If there are twenty among you with determination they will vanquish two hundred; if there are a hundred then they will slaughter a thousand unbelievers, for the infidels are a people devoid of understanding.”
Surah 8:73 “The unbelieving infidels are allies. Unless you (Muslims) aid each other (fighting as one united block to make Allah’s religion victorious), there will be confusion and mischief. Those who accepted Islam, left their homes to fight in Allah’s Cause (al-Jihad), as well as those who give them asylum, shelter, and aid—these are (all) Believers: for them is pardon and bountiful provision (in Paradise).”
Surah 9:5 “Fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, take them captive, harass them, lie in wait and ambush them using every stratagem of war.”
Surah 9:14 “Fight them and Allah will punish them by your hands, lay them low, and cover them with shame. He will help you over them.”
Surah 9:29 “Fight those who do not believe until they all surrender, paying the protective tax* in submission.” *protection tax is called the "jizyah" tax.
Surah 9:123 “Fight the unbelievers around you, and let them find harshness in you.”
QANA BUILDING FELL LONG AFTER ATTACK: MUSLIMS KILLED MUSLIMS?
J. Grant Swank, Jr.
The Qana village building collapsed at 8 AM.
The attack on the building was around midnight.
What gives?
Hezbollah explosives in the structure exploded, causing the collapse. Sixty in the building were killed by the collapse.
Brigadier General Amir Eshel, Head of the Air Force Headquarters, provided detail for journalists at the Defense Ministry in Tel Aviv.
It just might have been that Hezbollah allowed its own Muslims to be crushed in the collapse in order to press the world to rise up against Israel for a cease-fire. Islam allows Muslims to kill Muslims in order to see through Islamic world rule.
In the meantime, why all the wailing about Muslim children being killed in this conflict?
I don’t know why all the anguish over caring for the Muslim boys and girls being killed in the present war. Muslims don’t care about the boys and girls.
They have schools where they teach neurotic lessons to their own offspring. There instructors teach them in play acting how to behead an infidel.
They have telecasts for children running constantly in the Middle East Arab geographies whereby children viewers are taught to hate the "Jew-pigs," the latter term coined by Muslims who teach their own that Jews are descended from monkeys and pigs.
They have suicide belts tied to their daughters and sons.
They have rifles pushed into their children hands before they can play with tinker toys and blocks.
They take their little girls to circumcise them — genital mutilation. Muslim mothers hold down the screaming daughter while the father takes a razor blade or scissors to cut away part of the girl’s private parts.
They take their children to witness lashings of teens in the town square.
They walk their boys and girls to the crane where a teen girl’s head is laced in a noose for hanging. Then they stand there with their children, seeing the girl’s legs and feet kick violently till all life is gone from her body. All week long they take their children to see humans hung from poles alongside the roads.
They direct their own children to the pit where a woman has been placed with dirt up to her breasts. Then they hand stones to their boys and girls to help in crushing in her head. The stones are the sizes prescribed by the Koran — not too large so as to kill quickly and not too small so as to take forever to murder the woman.
So why should the United Nations weep over Arab children being killed in the present conflict?
Why should the free nation leaders call for a breather in the conflict so that families with children can escape being killed?
Far better to be killed by a bomb at an early age in Islam than live to be psychologically deranged as the adult killers are in Iraq and Afghanistan. The
Hezbollah is composed of such neurotic children-grown-to-adult age.
So let the war work its way through. Blood is blood to Muslims.
They live for blood, from earlier childhood. The Muslim adults should be proud to have their children killed in the war for they consider such a religious sacrifice to Allah; it is a pious act.
One Muslim mother sacrificed three of her adult sons to Allah as suicide bombers. She then kissed three more grown sons in front of a crowd, stating she was willing that they be suicide cases, too. She would then be a proud Muslim mother who had six adult sons snuffed out by their own choosing as sacrifices to Allah.
I just don’t get why civil citizens of the planet worry about the Muslim children being killed.
The Muslim adults surely don’t care.
Copyright © 2006 by J. Grant Swank, Jr.
http://www.truthinconviction.us/weblog.php
joseph_swank@yahoo.com
ALLAH: "Fight, slay Unbelievers wherever ye find them.Seize them, beleaguer them, lie in wait for them in every stratagem of war."
Qur'an, Sura 9:5
CHRIST: For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.
John 3:16
The Qana village building collapsed at 8 AM.
The attack on the building was around midnight.
What gives?
Hezbollah explosives in the structure exploded, causing the collapse. Sixty in the building were killed by the collapse.
Brigadier General Amir Eshel, Head of the Air Force Headquarters, provided detail for journalists at the Defense Ministry in Tel Aviv.
It just might have been that Hezbollah allowed its own Muslims to be crushed in the collapse in order to press the world to rise up against Israel for a cease-fire. Islam allows Muslims to kill Muslims in order to see through Islamic world rule.
In the meantime, why all the wailing about Muslim children being killed in this conflict?
I don’t know why all the anguish over caring for the Muslim boys and girls being killed in the present war. Muslims don’t care about the boys and girls.
They have schools where they teach neurotic lessons to their own offspring. There instructors teach them in play acting how to behead an infidel.
They have telecasts for children running constantly in the Middle East Arab geographies whereby children viewers are taught to hate the "Jew-pigs," the latter term coined by Muslims who teach their own that Jews are descended from monkeys and pigs.
They have suicide belts tied to their daughters and sons.
They have rifles pushed into their children hands before they can play with tinker toys and blocks.
They take their little girls to circumcise them — genital mutilation. Muslim mothers hold down the screaming daughter while the father takes a razor blade or scissors to cut away part of the girl’s private parts.
They take their children to witness lashings of teens in the town square.
They walk their boys and girls to the crane where a teen girl’s head is laced in a noose for hanging. Then they stand there with their children, seeing the girl’s legs and feet kick violently till all life is gone from her body. All week long they take their children to see humans hung from poles alongside the roads.
They direct their own children to the pit where a woman has been placed with dirt up to her breasts. Then they hand stones to their boys and girls to help in crushing in her head. The stones are the sizes prescribed by the Koran — not too large so as to kill quickly and not too small so as to take forever to murder the woman.
So why should the United Nations weep over Arab children being killed in the present conflict?
Why should the free nation leaders call for a breather in the conflict so that families with children can escape being killed?
Far better to be killed by a bomb at an early age in Islam than live to be psychologically deranged as the adult killers are in Iraq and Afghanistan. The
Hezbollah is composed of such neurotic children-grown-to-adult age.
So let the war work its way through. Blood is blood to Muslims.
They live for blood, from earlier childhood. The Muslim adults should be proud to have their children killed in the war for they consider such a religious sacrifice to Allah; it is a pious act.
One Muslim mother sacrificed three of her adult sons to Allah as suicide bombers. She then kissed three more grown sons in front of a crowd, stating she was willing that they be suicide cases, too. She would then be a proud Muslim mother who had six adult sons snuffed out by their own choosing as sacrifices to Allah.
I just don’t get why civil citizens of the planet worry about the Muslim children being killed.
The Muslim adults surely don’t care.
Copyright © 2006 by J. Grant Swank, Jr.
http://www.truthinconviction.us/weblog.php
joseph_swank@yahoo.com
ALLAH: "Fight, slay Unbelievers wherever ye find them.Seize them, beleaguer them, lie in wait for them in every stratagem of war."
Qur'an, Sura 9:5
CHRIST: For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.
John 3:16
Politically Incorrect
* Terrorists (i.e. Islamists targeting unarmed civilians) are not
"insurgents".
* There are no 'same extremists everywhere', even if the phrase could
make one feel better
* "Palestinians" are another group of Arab settlers in the holyland,
mainly since the 1880s.
* Arab racists slave masters leading the genocide in Sudan are clear
perpetrators of one the worst crimes against humanity, not a mere party
to a "conlict".
* Anti-Israelism is racism.
* The blood of a right wing, middle wing, left wing infidel is exactly
the same in the eyes of Arab Muslim Jihadists.
* How exactly, do anti Americans call the "imperial" US when receiving
it's humanitarian aid?
* Mentioning "freedom fighting" in context with anti - freedom thugs is
as abhorrent as mentioning "conflict" in context of each Islamic Jihad
deliberate attack on innocent men, women & children..
* The Apartheid in the Islamic world is not any part of: "we shall
respect their culture".
* Forcing upon Israel to "evacuate" Jews from their homes amounts to
forced ethnic cleansing.
theproblemwithmostarabmuslims.blogspot
'Black spinster' label pinned on Condi Rice
FROM WND'S JERUSALEM BUREAU
Palestinian media use racist terms including 'colored dark skin lady'
JERUSALEM – While U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has been in the Middle East meeting regional alongside Israel's military campaign in Lebanon, media outlets controlled by Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas' Fatah party the past few days have been using racist rhetoric in their reports, referring to the American representative as the "black woman," "raven," "colored dark skinned black lady" and "black spinster."
The Palestinian media coverage follows an article last week in which WND reported senior Fatah members staged an anti-American protest outside the main government building in Ramallah while Abbas met with Rice. Most media coverage of last Wednesday's Ramallah protests claimed ralliers were affiliated with Hamas and Islamic Jihad.
article with picture here
Palestinian media use racist terms including 'colored dark skin lady'
JERUSALEM – While U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has been in the Middle East meeting regional alongside Israel's military campaign in Lebanon, media outlets controlled by Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas' Fatah party the past few days have been using racist rhetoric in their reports, referring to the American representative as the "black woman," "raven," "colored dark skinned black lady" and "black spinster."
The Palestinian media coverage follows an article last week in which WND reported senior Fatah members staged an anti-American protest outside the main government building in Ramallah while Abbas met with Rice. Most media coverage of last Wednesday's Ramallah protests claimed ralliers were affiliated with Hamas and Islamic Jihad.
article with picture here
U.N.'s Annan & Hezbollah's Nasrallah
Kofi Annan shaking hands with the leader of the terrorist organization Hezbollah.
Myths & Facts :The Palestinian Uprisings
MYTH
“The intifada was a spontaneous uprising, resulting solely from Arab anger at Israeli atrocities.”
FACT
False charges of Israeli atrocities and instigation from the Muslim clergy in the mosques played an important role in starting the intifada (popularly translated as "uprising," but literally means "shaking off").
On December 6, 1987, an Israeli was stabbed to death while shopping in Gaza. One day later, four residents of the Jabalya refugee camp in Gaza were killed in a traffic accident. Rumors that the four had been killed by Israelis as a deliberate act of revenge began to spread among the Palestinians.1
Mass rioting broke out in Jabalya on the morning of December 9, during which a 17-year-old youth was killed by an Israeli soldier after throwing a Molotov cocktail at an army patrol.2 This soon sparked a wave of unrest that engulfed the West Bank, Gaza and Jerusalem.
MYTH
“The intifada constituted passive resistance. At its worst, it involved nothing more than children tossing stones at heavily armed soldiers.”
FACT
The intifada was violent from the start. During the first four years of the uprising, more than 3,600 Molotov cocktail attacks, 100 hand grenade attacks and 600 assaults with guns or explosives were reported by the Israel Defense Forces. The violence was directed at soldiers and civilians alike. Between December 9, 1987, and the signing of the Oslo accords (September 13, 1993), 160 Israelis were killed, including 100 civilians. Thousands more were injured.3
MYTH
“Media coverage of the intifada was fair and balanced.”
FACT
Candid members of the media admitted that coverage of the intifada was skewed. According to Steven Emerson, then a CNN correspondent, U.S. reporters acquiesced to Palestinian control over what was filmed. An Israeli cameraman who worked for several U.S. networks told Emerson that "if we aim the camera at the wrong scene, we'll be dead." In other instances, the networks handed out dozens of video cameras to Palestinians so that they could provide footage of strikes, riots and funerals. "There is absolutely no way to ensure the authenticity of what is filmed, nor is there any way to stop the cameras from being used as a tool to mobilize a demonstration," he wrote.4
Although nearly one-third of all Palestinians murdered in 1989 were killed by their Arab brethren, only 12 of the more than 150 stories filed by U.S. networks from the West Bank that year dealt with the internecine warfare. "While Palestinian political terror on the West Bank fails to make the news," Emerson wrote, "utter fabrications about Israeli brutality are reported uncritically."
For example, in early 1988, reporters were called to el-Mokassed Hospital in Jerusalem to film a dying Palestinian boy. His Palestinian doctor showed him hooked to life-support tubes, and claimed the child had been savagely beaten by Israeli troops.
On February 8, 1988, ABC's Peter Jennings introduced the report by saying UN officials "say that the Israelis have beaten another Palestinian to death in the territories." NBC and CBS also gave the claims wide publicity.
But the story wasn't true. According to the child's autopsy and medical records, he died of a cerebral hemorrhage. He had been sick for more than a year.
Overall, the U.S. networks, Emerson wrote, "have been complicit in a massive deception about the West Bank conflict."
NBC's Tel Aviv bureau chief Martin Fletcher acknowledged that the intifada posed a fairness problem. He noted the Palestinians manipulated the Western media by casting themselves as "David" against the Israeli "Goliath," a metaphor used by
Fletcher himself in a 1988 report.
"The whole uprising was media-oriented, and, without a doubt, kept going because of the media," he said. Fletcher openly admitted accepting invitations from young Palestinians to film violent attacks against Jewish residents of the West Bank.
"It's really a matter of manipulation of the media. And the question is: How much do we play that game? [We do it] in the same way that we turn up at all those Bush or Reagan photo opportunities. We play along because we need the pictures."5
MYTH
“The PLO had no role in fomenting intifada violence.”
FACT
Throughout the intifada, the PLO played a lead role in orchestrating the insurrection. The PLO-dominated Unified Leadership of the Intifada (UNLI), for example, frequently issued leaflets dictating which days violence was to be escalated, and who was to be its target.
In 1989, for example, the PLO declared February 13 a day for "escalating attacks on the collaborators" and "traitors" who work for the Civil Administration in the territories.
The PLO's Baghdad radio station described methods of arson through which "the orchards and fields of the Zionist enemy can be set ablaze."6
The New York Times described the discovery of "a cache of detailed secret documents showing that the PLO hired local killers to assassinate other Palestinians and carry out 'military activity' against Israelis." One document described how the PLO wanted the attacks credited to fictional groups so as not to disturb the U.S.-PLO dialogue.7
Yasser Arafat defended the killing of Arabs deemed to be "collaborating with Israel." He delegated the authority to carry out executions to the intifada leadership. After the murders, the local PLO death squad sent the file on the case to the PLO. "We have studied the files of those who were executed, and found that only two of the 118 who were executed were innocent," Arafat said. The innocent victims were declared "martyrs of the Palestinian revolution" by the PLO.8
Palestinians were stabbed, hacked with axes, shot, clubbed and burned with acid.
The justifications offered for the killings varied. Sometimes, being employed by the Civil Administration in the West Bank and Gaza Strip was reason enough. In other cases, contact with Jews warranted a death sentence. In October 1989, a Palestinian father of seven was knifed to death in Jericho after selling floral decorations to Jews who were building a succah. Accusations of "collaboration" with Israel were sometimes used as a pretext for acts of personal vengeance.
Women deemed to have behaved "immorally" were also among the victims.9
The UNLI's calls for violence escalated after the 1990 Temple Mount riot in which 17 Arabs were killed.. Yasser Abd-Rabbo — formerly the PLO's interlocutor in its dialogue with the U.S. — declared that "the war of stabbing with knives against the usurpers of Jerusalem is just beginning."10
The PLO continued its efforts to foment violence throughout 1991. On March 3, the UNLI issued a communiqué calling for "increased confrontation" with Israeli forces in the West Bank and Gaza. Another PLO leaflet, issued in September, called for the "execution" of anyone who sells property in Jerusalem to Jews.11
According to the Israeli government, the PFLP alone carried out 122 terrorist attacks during 1991, resulting in the murders of 18 residents of Israel and the territories.
Crimes committed by Fatah included the July 4 murder of a 61-year-old Arab villager near Jenin; the September killing of Israeli Sgt. Yoram Cohen and the October murder of a man found stabbed to death in a Gaza street, his head covered with a sack. A note bearing the words "Force-17," denoting Arafat's personal bodyguard, was found on the body.12
Later in the intifada, Hamas began to vie with the PLO for control of the uprising. In December 1992, for example, Hamas began to target IDF troops, killing four in several daring ambushes.
MYTH
“The Palestinians who died in the intifada were all killed by the Israelis.”
FACT
Initially, more Palestinians died in clashes with Israeli troops — battles usually triggered by Arab attacks against soldiers — than were killed by their fellow Palestinians in the intrafada. This changed dramatically in early 1990. In that year, the number of Palestinians dying in engagements with Israelis fell by more than half.
More Palestinians were murdered by Palestinians in the intrafada during that period. The internecine killings increased in 1991, with 238 Palestinians (up from 156) dying in the intrafada, more than triple the number who died at the hands of Israelis.13
Nearly 200 Palestinians were killed by their fellow Palestinians in 1992, more than double the number killed in clashes with Israeli security forces. The methods of murder, Steven Emerson reported, included beheading, mutilation, cutting off ears and limbs and pouring acid on a victim's face.14
The reign of terror became so serious that some Palestinians expressed public concern about the disorder. The PLO began to call for an end to the violence, but murders by its members and rivals continued.
When many Palestinians heard a knock at the door late at night, the New York Times reported, they were relieved to find an Israeli soldier rather than a masked Palestinian standing outside.15 Even after the intifada fizzled out following the signing of the Declaration of Principles in 1993, internecine warfare among the Palestinians continued, and persists to this day.
Read more HERE
“The intifada was a spontaneous uprising, resulting solely from Arab anger at Israeli atrocities.”
FACT
False charges of Israeli atrocities and instigation from the Muslim clergy in the mosques played an important role in starting the intifada (popularly translated as "uprising," but literally means "shaking off").
On December 6, 1987, an Israeli was stabbed to death while shopping in Gaza. One day later, four residents of the Jabalya refugee camp in Gaza were killed in a traffic accident. Rumors that the four had been killed by Israelis as a deliberate act of revenge began to spread among the Palestinians.1
Mass rioting broke out in Jabalya on the morning of December 9, during which a 17-year-old youth was killed by an Israeli soldier after throwing a Molotov cocktail at an army patrol.2 This soon sparked a wave of unrest that engulfed the West Bank, Gaza and Jerusalem.
MYTH
“The intifada constituted passive resistance. At its worst, it involved nothing more than children tossing stones at heavily armed soldiers.”
FACT
The intifada was violent from the start. During the first four years of the uprising, more than 3,600 Molotov cocktail attacks, 100 hand grenade attacks and 600 assaults with guns or explosives were reported by the Israel Defense Forces. The violence was directed at soldiers and civilians alike. Between December 9, 1987, and the signing of the Oslo accords (September 13, 1993), 160 Israelis were killed, including 100 civilians. Thousands more were injured.3
MYTH
“Media coverage of the intifada was fair and balanced.”
FACT
Candid members of the media admitted that coverage of the intifada was skewed. According to Steven Emerson, then a CNN correspondent, U.S. reporters acquiesced to Palestinian control over what was filmed. An Israeli cameraman who worked for several U.S. networks told Emerson that "if we aim the camera at the wrong scene, we'll be dead." In other instances, the networks handed out dozens of video cameras to Palestinians so that they could provide footage of strikes, riots and funerals. "There is absolutely no way to ensure the authenticity of what is filmed, nor is there any way to stop the cameras from being used as a tool to mobilize a demonstration," he wrote.4
Although nearly one-third of all Palestinians murdered in 1989 were killed by their Arab brethren, only 12 of the more than 150 stories filed by U.S. networks from the West Bank that year dealt with the internecine warfare. "While Palestinian political terror on the West Bank fails to make the news," Emerson wrote, "utter fabrications about Israeli brutality are reported uncritically."
For example, in early 1988, reporters were called to el-Mokassed Hospital in Jerusalem to film a dying Palestinian boy. His Palestinian doctor showed him hooked to life-support tubes, and claimed the child had been savagely beaten by Israeli troops.
On February 8, 1988, ABC's Peter Jennings introduced the report by saying UN officials "say that the Israelis have beaten another Palestinian to death in the territories." NBC and CBS also gave the claims wide publicity.
But the story wasn't true. According to the child's autopsy and medical records, he died of a cerebral hemorrhage. He had been sick for more than a year.
Overall, the U.S. networks, Emerson wrote, "have been complicit in a massive deception about the West Bank conflict."
NBC's Tel Aviv bureau chief Martin Fletcher acknowledged that the intifada posed a fairness problem. He noted the Palestinians manipulated the Western media by casting themselves as "David" against the Israeli "Goliath," a metaphor used by
Fletcher himself in a 1988 report.
"The whole uprising was media-oriented, and, without a doubt, kept going because of the media," he said. Fletcher openly admitted accepting invitations from young Palestinians to film violent attacks against Jewish residents of the West Bank.
"It's really a matter of manipulation of the media. And the question is: How much do we play that game? [We do it] in the same way that we turn up at all those Bush or Reagan photo opportunities. We play along because we need the pictures."5
MYTH
“The PLO had no role in fomenting intifada violence.”
FACT
Throughout the intifada, the PLO played a lead role in orchestrating the insurrection. The PLO-dominated Unified Leadership of the Intifada (UNLI), for example, frequently issued leaflets dictating which days violence was to be escalated, and who was to be its target.
In 1989, for example, the PLO declared February 13 a day for "escalating attacks on the collaborators" and "traitors" who work for the Civil Administration in the territories.
The PLO's Baghdad radio station described methods of arson through which "the orchards and fields of the Zionist enemy can be set ablaze."6
The New York Times described the discovery of "a cache of detailed secret documents showing that the PLO hired local killers to assassinate other Palestinians and carry out 'military activity' against Israelis." One document described how the PLO wanted the attacks credited to fictional groups so as not to disturb the U.S.-PLO dialogue.7
Yasser Arafat defended the killing of Arabs deemed to be "collaborating with Israel." He delegated the authority to carry out executions to the intifada leadership. After the murders, the local PLO death squad sent the file on the case to the PLO. "We have studied the files of those who were executed, and found that only two of the 118 who were executed were innocent," Arafat said. The innocent victims were declared "martyrs of the Palestinian revolution" by the PLO.8
Palestinians were stabbed, hacked with axes, shot, clubbed and burned with acid.
The justifications offered for the killings varied. Sometimes, being employed by the Civil Administration in the West Bank and Gaza Strip was reason enough. In other cases, contact with Jews warranted a death sentence. In October 1989, a Palestinian father of seven was knifed to death in Jericho after selling floral decorations to Jews who were building a succah. Accusations of "collaboration" with Israel were sometimes used as a pretext for acts of personal vengeance.
Women deemed to have behaved "immorally" were also among the victims.9
The UNLI's calls for violence escalated after the 1990 Temple Mount riot in which 17 Arabs were killed.. Yasser Abd-Rabbo — formerly the PLO's interlocutor in its dialogue with the U.S. — declared that "the war of stabbing with knives against the usurpers of Jerusalem is just beginning."10
The PLO continued its efforts to foment violence throughout 1991. On March 3, the UNLI issued a communiqué calling for "increased confrontation" with Israeli forces in the West Bank and Gaza. Another PLO leaflet, issued in September, called for the "execution" of anyone who sells property in Jerusalem to Jews.11
According to the Israeli government, the PFLP alone carried out 122 terrorist attacks during 1991, resulting in the murders of 18 residents of Israel and the territories.
Crimes committed by Fatah included the July 4 murder of a 61-year-old Arab villager near Jenin; the September killing of Israeli Sgt. Yoram Cohen and the October murder of a man found stabbed to death in a Gaza street, his head covered with a sack. A note bearing the words "Force-17," denoting Arafat's personal bodyguard, was found on the body.12
Later in the intifada, Hamas began to vie with the PLO for control of the uprising. In December 1992, for example, Hamas began to target IDF troops, killing four in several daring ambushes.
MYTH
“The Palestinians who died in the intifada were all killed by the Israelis.”
FACT
Initially, more Palestinians died in clashes with Israeli troops — battles usually triggered by Arab attacks against soldiers — than were killed by their fellow Palestinians in the intrafada. This changed dramatically in early 1990. In that year, the number of Palestinians dying in engagements with Israelis fell by more than half.
More Palestinians were murdered by Palestinians in the intrafada during that period. The internecine killings increased in 1991, with 238 Palestinians (up from 156) dying in the intrafada, more than triple the number who died at the hands of Israelis.13
Nearly 200 Palestinians were killed by their fellow Palestinians in 1992, more than double the number killed in clashes with Israeli security forces. The methods of murder, Steven Emerson reported, included beheading, mutilation, cutting off ears and limbs and pouring acid on a victim's face.14
The reign of terror became so serious that some Palestinians expressed public concern about the disorder. The PLO began to call for an end to the violence, but murders by its members and rivals continued.
When many Palestinians heard a knock at the door late at night, the New York Times reported, they were relieved to find an Israeli soldier rather than a masked Palestinian standing outside.15 Even after the intifada fizzled out following the signing of the Declaration of Principles in 1993, internecine warfare among the Palestinians continued, and persists to this day.
Read more HERE
America’s Earliest Terrorists
Lessons from America’s first war against Islamic terror. (Barbary pirates)
By Joshua E. London
At the dawn of a new century, a newly elected United States president was forced to confront a grave threat to the nation — an escalating series of unprovoked attacks on Americans by Muslim terrorists. Worse still, these Islamic partisans operated under the protection and sponsorship of rogue Arab states ruled by ruthless and cunning dictators.
Sluggish in recognizing the full nature of the threat, America entered the war well after the enemy’s call to arms. Poorly planned and feebly executed, the American effort proceeded badly and at great expense — resulting in a hastily negotiated peace and an equally hasty declaration of victory.
As timely and familiar as these events may seem, they occurred more than two centuries ago. The president was Thomas Jefferson, and the terrorists were the Barbary pirates. Unfortunately, many of the easy lessons to be plucked from this experience have yet to be fully learned.
The Barbary states, modern-day Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, and Libya, are collectively known to the Arab world as the Maghrib (“Land of Sunset”), denoting Islam’s territorial holdings west of Egypt. With the advance of Mohammed’s armies into the Christian Levant in the seventh century, the Mediterranean was slowly transformed into the backwater frontier of the battles between crescent and cross. Battles raged on both land and sea, and religious piracy flourished.
Entire article here
By Joshua E. London
At the dawn of a new century, a newly elected United States president was forced to confront a grave threat to the nation — an escalating series of unprovoked attacks on Americans by Muslim terrorists. Worse still, these Islamic partisans operated under the protection and sponsorship of rogue Arab states ruled by ruthless and cunning dictators.
Sluggish in recognizing the full nature of the threat, America entered the war well after the enemy’s call to arms. Poorly planned and feebly executed, the American effort proceeded badly and at great expense — resulting in a hastily negotiated peace and an equally hasty declaration of victory.
As timely and familiar as these events may seem, they occurred more than two centuries ago. The president was Thomas Jefferson, and the terrorists were the Barbary pirates. Unfortunately, many of the easy lessons to be plucked from this experience have yet to be fully learned.
The Barbary states, modern-day Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, and Libya, are collectively known to the Arab world as the Maghrib (“Land of Sunset”), denoting Islam’s territorial holdings west of Egypt. With the advance of Mohammed’s armies into the Christian Levant in the seventh century, the Mediterranean was slowly transformed into the backwater frontier of the battles between crescent and cross. Battles raged on both land and sea, and religious piracy flourished.
Entire article here
Sunday, July 30, 2006
ANOTHER IRANIAN NUTHOUSE MOVE: women-only parks
Grant Swank, Jr.
While planning on blowing up the planet’s surface so that his messiah can return midst holocaust, Iran’s President, former thug tender, has announced segregated parks, per CAGE at www.acage.org
Women-only parks? Yes. The so-called ‘holy city’ of Oom, south of Tehran, will give the project its first kick-off. Welcome, ladies garbed from head to toe.
But how can there be any fellowship in the parks for females only when they can’t tell one another apart. Will they wear nametags?
And what is the rationale behind this unreasonable move? It cannot be that a fully clothed Muslim female would be flirting with a non-Muslim male, the latter cause for her to be shot in the head by any clan male member. So what is going on here?
Obviously the non-Muslim press does not know; nevertheless, they do report that The City Islamic Council in Oom moved the measure without difficulty. Is that not what a city council is for?
Four such parks will be in vogue shortly.
Further: The National Women’s Council made their own press release. "A sex-segregated park was under development in the northeastern city of Mashad." The media did not explain if that act had anything to do with the males’ prior decision.
"The development of sex-segregated parks was given a big boost after hard-liner Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, a former Revolutionary Guards commander, became Iran’s president. Prior to his rise to the presidency, Ahmadinejad was the Mayor of Tehran. One of his first decisions in the city hall was to order gender segregation on elevators."
Entire article here
Copyright © 2006 by J. Grant Swank, Jr.
http://www.truthinconviction.us/weblog.php
joseph_swank@yahoo.com
ALLAH: "Fight, slay Unbelievers wherever ye find them.Seize them, beleaguer them, lie in wait for them in every stratagem of war."
Qur'an, Sura 9:5
CHRIST: For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.
John 3:16
While planning on blowing up the planet’s surface so that his messiah can return midst holocaust, Iran’s President, former thug tender, has announced segregated parks, per CAGE at www.acage.org
Women-only parks? Yes. The so-called ‘holy city’ of Oom, south of Tehran, will give the project its first kick-off. Welcome, ladies garbed from head to toe.
But how can there be any fellowship in the parks for females only when they can’t tell one another apart. Will they wear nametags?
And what is the rationale behind this unreasonable move? It cannot be that a fully clothed Muslim female would be flirting with a non-Muslim male, the latter cause for her to be shot in the head by any clan male member. So what is going on here?
Obviously the non-Muslim press does not know; nevertheless, they do report that The City Islamic Council in Oom moved the measure without difficulty. Is that not what a city council is for?
Four such parks will be in vogue shortly.
Further: The National Women’s Council made their own press release. "A sex-segregated park was under development in the northeastern city of Mashad." The media did not explain if that act had anything to do with the males’ prior decision.
"The development of sex-segregated parks was given a big boost after hard-liner Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, a former Revolutionary Guards commander, became Iran’s president. Prior to his rise to the presidency, Ahmadinejad was the Mayor of Tehran. One of his first decisions in the city hall was to order gender segregation on elevators."
Entire article here
Copyright © 2006 by J. Grant Swank, Jr.
http://www.truthinconviction.us/weblog.php
joseph_swank@yahoo.com
ALLAH: "Fight, slay Unbelievers wherever ye find them.Seize them, beleaguer them, lie in wait for them in every stratagem of war."
Qur'an, Sura 9:5
CHRIST: For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.
John 3:16
Jordan: MOM KILLS DAUGHTER WITH AX: honor killing
J. Grant Swank, Jr.
According to the Associated Foreign Press, a mother killed her daughter with an ax in order to see through the Islamic custom of maintaining clan honor. It’s known throughout the world by the misnomer, "honor killing."
It happened in Jordan, a country where the Queen was a recent guest on Oprah Winfrey Show. To hear the queen speak, one would have thought she resided in an American suburb. She even related how her king husband grills steaks on their outdoor grill.
Alongside the queen in her beauty and luxury are the Islamic customs telling of a barbaric country. The Muslim nations can shield truth from the free world only so long until the cruelty of Islam comes out in ugly force.
The 26-year-old daughter was axed in her sleep. Her mother did it. Why? Because the young woman had birthed a child while not wedded, per Jordan Times.
Mother, 69, sneaked into her daughter’s room with an ax. Then she leveled the heavy blows that bloodied out her existence. To make matters more hellishly bizarre, the mother was accompanied by another daughter to do in the sleeping young woman.
They had seen through a pious act. It made them holy in the sight of their neighbors.
Entire article here
Copyright © 2006 by J. Grant Swank, Jr.
http://www.truthinconviction.us/weblog.php
joseph_swank@yahoo.com
ALLAH: "Fight, slay Unbelievers wherever ye find them.Seize them, beleaguer them, lie in wait for them in every stratagem of war."
Qur'an, Sura 9:5
CHRIST: For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.
John 3:16
It is easy to be angry with the Muslim population of the world, anger is a rational and human emotion. I am HIGHLY angered right now at the atrocities the Muslims cause around the planet to Muslims and non - Muslims. But I remind myself constantly , don't hate the sinner, hate the sin. If one had cancer, I would not hate the patient, I would deplore the disease and pray for the patient.
I have read articles like this for years, seen the videos of beheadings, limbs being ripped from people, hangings, impalings, pictures of people being skinned alive for allah, people burned, raped, eyes gouged out, villages burned, read the articles of young girls in Africa sold into slavery to Arab Muslims for pleasure to there masters, Russian children shot in the back of the head, forced to drink there own urine. I can not hate such people, but pity them. The saddest thing of all is, I no longer am shocked by these things, I have come to expect it from the "Religion of peace."
Jeff Davis
Australian Prime Minister Backs Surveillance in Mosques
From August 24, 2005 @ JihadWatch.com
CANBERRA, Aug 24 (Reuters) - Prime Minister John Howard angered some Australian Muslims on Wednesday by saying he supported spies monitoring the nation's mosques....
Howard said that while the government had no wish to interfere with the freedom and practice of religion, he supported sending people into mosques and Islamic schools to make sure nobody was promoting support for violence or extremism.
"We have a right to know whether there is, within any section of the Islamic community, a preaching of the virtues of terrorism, whether any comfort or harbour is given to terrorism within that community," Howard told Australian radio.
Muslim Civil Rights Advocacy Network convenor Waleed Kadous said Howard should be consulting more with the Muslim community.
"Such hardline talk only isolates some parts of the Muslim community even further and makes it harder for cooperation between the Muslim community and the government," Kadous told Australian Associated Press.
Iran forces urged to prepare to hit Israel
Sunday, 30 July 2006
TEHRAN (Reuters) - Iran's hardline forces should get ready to take revenge on Israel and the United States for the offensive on Lebanon, the head of the Revolutionary Guards was quoted as saying on Sunday.
"The Basij and Revolutionary Guards should prepare to get even with the Zionists and Americans," Yahya Rahim-Safavi was quoted as telling Islamic militiamen by the conservative Fars news agency.
The Basij are volunteer Islamic militiamen.
"The timing of the this will be announced by the leader," he added.
Entire article here
TEHRAN (Reuters) - Iran's hardline forces should get ready to take revenge on Israel and the United States for the offensive on Lebanon, the head of the Revolutionary Guards was quoted as saying on Sunday.
"The Basij and Revolutionary Guards should prepare to get even with the Zionists and Americans," Yahya Rahim-Safavi was quoted as telling Islamic militiamen by the conservative Fars news agency.
The Basij are volunteer Islamic militiamen.
"The timing of the this will be announced by the leader," he added.
Entire article here
IRAQ IMPLODING IMPACTS REPUBLICAN PARTY
J. Grant Swank, Jr.
America is in a strange state of affairs. We have a weak Democratic Party given to immorality and liberal baselines. We have a Republican Party not able to see through its freedom mission, particularly in Iraq. Add to that the rise of Hezbollah assisted by Syria and Iran in saying Israel will be no more. In that the
Arab world is lining up to do in Israel as never before.
US President George W. Bush and Iraqi Prime Minister Al-Maliki, a Shiite Muslim, supposedly came to some agreement when the latter was in Washington. But if they did, how will that play out in Iraq? It won't. It might have given the PM time before the US Congress; but it will mean absolutely nothing to the fighting Muslims at home base.
Nothing. If anything, it will mean all the more that Iraqi grassroots animosity will build because of the PM cowing before the Oval Office.
Iraq will implode.
In fact, it is now imploding. Multinational forces are taken from other parts of Iraq into Baghdad in order to war against the Islamic fanatics setting the major city on fire. So that opens the hinterlands to the same Islamic fanatics. In other words, we don't have enough forces to undo Islamic fanatics who will kill one another in order to topple multinational forces throughout Iraq.
Entire article here
Copyright © 2006 by J. Grant Swank, Jr.
http://www.truthinconviction.us/weblog.php
joseph_swank@yahoo.com
ALLAH: "Fight, slay Unbelievers wherever ye find them.Seize them, beleaguer them, lie in wait for them in every stratagem of war."
Qur'an, Sura 9:5
CHRIST: For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.
John 3:16
Accept Islam or else.
Q: I have a question about offensive Jihad. Does it mean that we are to attack even those non-Muslims which don't do anything against Islam just because we have to propagate Islam?
A: You should understand that we as Muslims firmly believe that the person who doesn't believe in Allah as he is required to, is a disbeliever who would be doomed to Hell eternally. Thus one of the primary responsibilities of the Muslim ruler is to spread Islam throughout the world, thus saving people from eternal damnation.
Thus what is meant by the passage in Tafsir Uthmani, is that if a country doesn't allow the propagation of Islam to its inhabitants in a suitable manner or creates hindrances to this, then the Muslim ruler would be justifying in waging Jihad against this country, so that the message of Islam can reach its inhabitants, thus saving them from the Fire of Jahannum.
If the Kuffaar allow us to spread Islam peacefully, then we would not wage Jihad against them.
and Allah Ta'ala Knows Best Mufti Ebrahim Desai
From askimam.com
What the Imam is really saying is "Accept Islam or die." Again I await the "religion of peace", to start showing some peace and love , instead of murder , kidnapping and outright mayhem.
Jeff Davis
2 reasons why not all Muslims are terrorists.
In short, there are two reasons that not all Muslims are terrorists. First, not all who label themselves a Muslim are a true Muslim (just like not all who label themselves a Christian are a Christian). Second, this sixth pillar is an obligation on the entire community of Muslims and not each individual.
If you do find a Muslim who condemns the terrorists then pay close attention to their words. The Muslim will point out that it is wrong to kill civilians or those who are not at war with Muslims.
On the other hand, they never condemn the objectives of the terrorists because you cannot refute the objective using the Qur'an. It is the duty of the community of Muslims to destroy every non Muslim government and replace it with an Islamic government (khaleefah). Read and you will understand.
To a real Muslim, the question is not "should the United States government be destroyed?" but "have the residents of the United States been sufficiently called to Islam?" because all the scholars agree that Muslims are not allowed to fight the enemy unless they are called to Islam in the first instance. In other words good Muslims do not fight their enemy without first offering the enemy a chance to accept Islam.
If this offer is turned down, they are asked to pay 'Jizya' (head tax), and to be part of the State and be ruled by Islamic Shari'a. If the enemy (like the United States) refuses both options, Islam or Jizya, then the Muslims are allowed to declare war on them (and fly planes into buildings).
http://www.notislam.com/id8.html
IRAN: words like PIZZA are expunged
J. Grant Swank, Jr.
You can’t order a "pizza" in Iran. From here on out, you order an "elastic loaf."
Elastic loaf? Not where I order pizza!
Iranian President has made a decree on Saturday that Western words have to go. There are over 2000 terms that cannot be uttered in Iran.
There is another example of the high culture of Iran. So it goes in Islam the impossible cult. Watchdog police are all about. Your life surely is not your own, let alone your vocabulary.
Speaking of Vice and Virtue police checking on acts and verbiage, did you note the 16-year-old girl hung from a noose tied to a crane last week? The judge who pronounced her death was there to tie the knot tightly around her neck at 6 o’clock in the morning. The whole town turned out to watch. That included boys and girls, the likes of whom the UN would like to protect from death by Israeli bombs.
Yet Iranian judges hang them at the gallows. Crazy or what?
The teen’s mother committed suicide when she was young. She was mentally ill. Yet she was mercilessly tossed in jail time and again where guards took advantage of her. But of course she asked for it, being a lustful little urchin.
Therefore, she hung.
Entire article here
Copyright © 2006 by J. Grant Swank, Jr.
http://www.truthinconviction.us/weblog.php
joseph_swank@yahoo.com
ALLAH: "Fight, slay Unbelievers wherever ye find them.Seize them, beleaguer them, lie in wait for them in every stratagem of war."
Qur'an, Sura 9:5
CHRIST: For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.
John 3:16
Saturday, July 29, 2006
Canada: Muslims say CSIS has spies in many mosques (Mosquewatch alert)
TORONTO - Canada’s police and intelligence agencies, through their use of paid Muslim informants, effectively have spies in virtually every major mosque in Toronto, according to well-connected members of the Muslim community.
The Canadian Security Intelligence Service does not deny operating inside Muslim religious institutions, but insists that it hires informants to report on people, not places.
Those knowledgeable about mosques and the tactics of security services say it often amounts to the same thing.
“If they’re following certain people, an imam for example, and that imam is spending a lot of time at the mosque, then [the informant] is also spending a lot of time at the mosque,” even though they’re not specifically instructed to, said Yahya Fadalla, a Hamilton-based imam. Besides his religious education, Mr. Fadalla has a doctorate in computer science with a specialization in cyberterrorism and information warfare. Related to this article
Spying within the Muslim community appears to be far more widespread than previously thought. In fact, one prominent Toronto imam claims Fahim Ahmad, who has been characterized as a leader among the 17 individuals charged with terror-related offences in June, was himself once offered the opportunity to become a paid informant.
The issue has taken on greater prominence since Mubin Shaikh, a CSIS and RCMP informant, publicly disclosed he played an integral part in that investigation.
Mr. Shaikh said it’s a given that intelligence authorities have many informants within the community.
“If [intelligence authorities] want to do anything, it has to be done through the Muslims,” he said in an interview. “Of course they’re going to have eyes and ears everywhere.”
Mosquewatching indeed. Well done Canada, one can only HOPE the U.S.A. is doing the same.
WHY SHOULD WORLD CARE RE MUSLIM KIDS KILLED?
J. Grant Swank, Jr.
I don’t know why all the anguish over caring for the Muslim boys and girls being killed in the present war.
Muslims don’t care about the boys and girls.
They have schools where they teach neurotic lessons to their own offspring. There instructors teach them in play acting how to behead an infidel.
They have telecasts for children running constantly in the Middle East Arab geographies whereby children viewers are taught to hate the “Jew-pigs,” the latter term coined by Muslims who teach their own that Jews are descended from monkeys and pigs.
They have suicide belts tied to their daughters and sons.
They have rifles pushed into their children hands before they can play with tinker toys and blocks.
They take their little girls to circumcise them — genital mutilation. Muslim mothers hold down the screaming daughter while the father takes a razor blade or scissors to cut away part of the girl’s private parts.
They take their children to witness lashings of teens in the town square.
They walk their boys and girls to the crane where a teen girl’s head is laced in a noose for hanging. Then they stand there with their children, seeing the girl’s legs and feet kick violently till all life is gone from her body. All week long they take their children to see humans hung from poles alongside the roads.
They direct their own children to the pit where a woman has been placed with dirt up to her breasts. Then they hand stones to their boys and girls to help in crushing in her head. The stones are the sizes prescribed by the Koran — not too large so as to kill quickly and not too small so as to take forever to murder the woman.
So why should the United Nations weep over Arab children being killed in the present conflict?
Copyright © 2006 by J. Grant Swank, Jr.
http://www.truthinconviction.us/weblog.php
joseph_swank@yahoo.com
ALLAH: “Fight, slay Unbelievers wherever ye find them.Seize them, beleaguer them, lie in wait for them in every stratagem of war.”
Qur’an, Sura 9:5
CHRIST: For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.
John 3:16
Hezbollah, Bush & Blair, In That Order
J. Grant Swank, Jr.
Bush and Blair can talk till their gums bleed.
US President George W. Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair are talking in Washington. US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is back to Lebanon.Why?What these three people will talk about will have absolutely no impact on Hezbollah.
The United Nations officials have called for ceasefire. Other voices from free nation leaders echo that plea.What these calls for peace will come to is naught. Hezbollah does not care.Israel knows all that. Therefore, Israel will continue to continue just as Hezbollah will continue to continue.
The bottom line to the conflict is that Hezbollah answers to no one but Hezbollah. Period. All the fancy talks can ring around the rosey; but they don't mean anything but wasted air currents.
According to Adla Massoud for Aljazeera, "Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah said they (Hezbollah) are fighting not only to defend Lebanon but they are fighting for the whole Arab region.
He also said the war will continue whether the Lebanese people like it or not."
That is the alpha and omega of Hezbollah.
ENTIRE ARTICLE HERE
Copyright © 2006 by J. Grant Swank, Jr.
http://www.truthinconviction.us/weblog.php
joseph_swank@yahoo.com
ALLAH: “Fight, slay Unbelievers wherever ye find them.Seize them, beleaguer them, lie in wait for them in every stratagem of war.”
Qur’an, Sura 9:5
CHRIST: For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.
John 3:16
Friday, July 28, 2006
INDIA: ANTI-CONVERSION LAW PASSED
J. Grant Swank, Jr.
For a person to convert to Christ, he must have the government sign over that he can convert to Christ. In other words, there is no freedom of religious choice in India, per Compass Direct News. One has to bow down to the government officialdom first; otherwise, he sets himself up for persecution.
Persecution against Christians is a daily occurrence in India. Now it will increase.
In Madbya Pradesh north-central state, the state lawmakers passed the statute "making stricter the ‘anti-conversion’ law that has increased persecution of Christians."
When living in America with its freedom of religion, one can hardly imagine what it is like to live in a repressive regime where even the matters of soul choice must pass through the hands of the secular minds with power. To the Christian, that is another demonic move to work against the Holy Spirit’s love upon an inquiring soul.
"The amendment, introduced in the House assembly on Friday (July 21), requires clergy and ‘prospective converts’ to notify authorities of the intent to change religion one month before a ‘conversion ceremony.’ In its current form, the Madhya Pradesh Freedom of Religion Act of 1968 requires that notice be sent to the district magistrate within seven days of conversion."
Imagine what all that means for a sincere convert to Christ along with his pastor having to write out forms before the testimony is made public. In America, a person chooses Christ as Lord God. That is it. He and his friends along with spiritual leaders can make known that joyous decision to anyone and everyone.
Not so in India.
"The advance information must state the name and address of the person converting, along with the date and venue of the conversion ceremony, after which authorities will decide whether the conversion was ‘forced’ or ‘by allurement’
"The penalty for failing to notify the administration remains imprisonment of up to one year, or a fine of up to 1,000 rupees (US$21), or both. Presented by state Home Minister Nagendra Singh, the amendment was passed by a voice vote without discussion.
Entire article here
India what are you thinking ?
For a person to convert to Christ, he must have the government sign over that he can convert to Christ. In other words, there is no freedom of religious choice in India, per Compass Direct News. One has to bow down to the government officialdom first; otherwise, he sets himself up for persecution.
Persecution against Christians is a daily occurrence in India. Now it will increase.
In Madbya Pradesh north-central state, the state lawmakers passed the statute "making stricter the ‘anti-conversion’ law that has increased persecution of Christians."
When living in America with its freedom of religion, one can hardly imagine what it is like to live in a repressive regime where even the matters of soul choice must pass through the hands of the secular minds with power. To the Christian, that is another demonic move to work against the Holy Spirit’s love upon an inquiring soul.
"The amendment, introduced in the House assembly on Friday (July 21), requires clergy and ‘prospective converts’ to notify authorities of the intent to change religion one month before a ‘conversion ceremony.’ In its current form, the Madhya Pradesh Freedom of Religion Act of 1968 requires that notice be sent to the district magistrate within seven days of conversion."
Imagine what all that means for a sincere convert to Christ along with his pastor having to write out forms before the testimony is made public. In America, a person chooses Christ as Lord God. That is it. He and his friends along with spiritual leaders can make known that joyous decision to anyone and everyone.
Not so in India.
"The advance information must state the name and address of the person converting, along with the date and venue of the conversion ceremony, after which authorities will decide whether the conversion was ‘forced’ or ‘by allurement’
"The penalty for failing to notify the administration remains imprisonment of up to one year, or a fine of up to 1,000 rupees (US$21), or both. Presented by state Home Minister Nagendra Singh, the amendment was passed by a voice vote without discussion.
Entire article here
India what are you thinking ?
Fighting for the Cause of Allah (Jihaad)
Volume 4, Book 52, Number 82:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah's Apostle said, "Five are regarded as martyrs: They are those who die because of plague, abdominal disease, drowning or a falling building etc., and the martyrs in Allah's Cause."
Volume 4, Book 52, Number 82 (Source)
Fighting for the Cause of Allah (Jihaad)
Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah's Apostle said, "I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand." Abu Huraira added: Allah's Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).
Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220
Watch Middle East Peace Implode
J. Grant Swank, Jr.
Islamics will see to it that there is no Middle East peace.
The reason has to do with Islamic theology. Unfortunately, politicians and statesmen are not into exploring theologies of the planet. In that is their failure. And perhaps in that will be the demise of the planet’s world community as we know it.
Islamic theology is based on one book - the Koran. That book informs the Islamic about the end of the world, the coming of the Islamic messiah, the meaning of theocracy in contrast to a secular political state, the definition of freedom and what is expected of the genders in family, community and the world.
There is no division of church and religion in an Islamic state. Theology smothers the state with its own so-called ethic. Whereas other quarters of the world have a respect for government as well as individuals’ various faith systems, Islam knows of no such relationship.
In Islam, there is no other faith base. There is no other legitimate religion. There is no other deity but the Koran’s deity. There is no allowance for tolerance when it comes to others’ beliefs.
Islam is the alpha and omega of personal faith and political / judicial governance. In that are all the paragraphs of the Koran - both those that hoodwink by speaking sweetly and those that order devotees to pull out infidel tongues, gouge out their eyes, slaughter them with the sword and so forth.
Click here for entire article
WHY GOD FORMED ISRAEL AS A NATION: PROPHET EZEKIEL
J. Grant Swank, Jr.
Read Ezekiel, chapter 36 through 39.
There you will read why Jehovah promised that “in the latter days” Jews would come from every nation into their own country.
That occurred on May 14, 1948, by an act of the United Nations. Since that day till now, Arabs have sought to destroy every Jew on Earth, beginning in Israel, pushing Jews into the Mediterranean.
The next generation of Arab youth are taught to hate “Jew-pigs,” as they are called for Arabs consider Jews descendants of monkeys and pigs.
In other words, the formation of Israel as a legitimate nation did not bring peace to the Jewish inhabitants. Instead, it has brought untold tension, including the present stress due to continued fighting between the descendants of Isaac and Ishmael.
It was Isaac who was the legitimate son of Abraham and wife Sarah. It was Ishmael who was the illegitimate son of Abraham and servant girl Hagar, the latter being Arab. The two boys grew up knowing one another — and tussling against one another. The prophecy was that they would continue the tension for future generations. We witness it played out ongoingly today and into the future.
Read Ezekiel, chapter 36 through 39.
There you will read why Jehovah promised that “in the latter days” Jews would come from every nation into their own country.
That occurred on May 14, 1948, by an act of the United Nations. Since that day till now, Arabs have sought to destroy every Jew on Earth, beginning in Israel, pushing Jews into the Mediterranean.
The next generation of Arab youth are taught to hate “Jew-pigs,” as they are called for Arabs consider Jews descendants of monkeys and pigs.
In other words, the formation of Israel as a legitimate nation did not bring peace to the Jewish inhabitants. Instead, it has brought untold tension, including the present stress due to continued fighting between the descendants of Isaac and Ishmael.
It was Isaac who was the legitimate son of Abraham and wife Sarah. It was Ishmael who was the illegitimate son of Abraham and servant girl Hagar, the latter being Arab. The two boys grew up knowing one another — and tussling against one another. The prophecy was that they would continue the tension for future generations. We witness it played out ongoingly today and into the future.
CHRISTIAN'S CHILDREN MUSLIM-KIDNAPPED: PAKISTAN
By J. Grant Swank, Jr.MichNews.comJul 28, 2006
She tried to explain to them the gospel of Jesus Christ, but while doing so, her two children were kidnapped by her Muslim husband.
She lives in a shelter, Center for Legal Aid Assistance and Settlement, in Pakistan. It is her only safe option for a dwelling place.
She herself had been kidnapped and then sold into marriage (a forced marriage) while 17, according to Compass Direct News.
Her days are spent in praying to Christ for the return of her children, though humanly speaking there is little expectation that that will happen. Even a Christian lawyer has concluded not to assist her for his own life would be in danger.
The police are doing nothing to help her; if anything, they are assisting the Islamic father of the children to continue in hiding.
Click here for entire article
Copyright © 2006 by J. Grant Swank, Jr.
http://www.truthinconviction.us
joseph_swank@yahoo.com
Thursday, July 27, 2006
Islamic terms : Marriage = Sex, Slavery
IN ISLAM the word most commonly employed for marriage is nikah, which means literally 'sexual intercourse'.
As a legal term it denotes the situation resulting from a particular contract, entered into by a man and a woman, by which sexual intercourse between them becomes legitimate in the eyes of God and society.
The only other mode of legitimizing this sexual relationship is by a man's purchasing a female slave, but this is a complicated discussion that cannot concern us here.
Article here http://www.al-islam.org/al-serat/muta/2.htm
"this is a complicated discussion that connot concern us here." WHAT ?
I believe this is of a great concern since it seems that sexual relations with a captive slave girl is HIGHLY UNNACCEPTABLE IN MODERN TIMES OR ANY OTHER TIMES FOR THIS MATTER!!!
This is Islam 101 though. Fighting, sex, and slavery, it has not changed in 1400 years, nor shall it.
For those wishing for an Islamic reform, wake up. Just because America wants Islam to "reform" (whatever this means) it is not going to happen, and the rest of the world will still continue to be murdered under the chant of "Allahu Akbar" .
Spare me the myth that Islam is peaceful or acceptable. If you are not Islamophobic yet, you are either ignorant or dead.
Jeff Davis
What is the islamic understanding about democracy, Is there any place for it in islam.
The common form of democracy prevalent at the moment is representative democracy, in which the citizens do not exercise their right of legislating and issuing political decrees in person, but rather through representatives chosen by them.
The constitution of a democratic country will be largely influenced by the needs and wants of its people.
Thus, if its people want casinos, bars, gay marriages, prostitution, etc. then with sufficient public pressure, all these vices can be accommodated for.
From this, it becomes simple to understand that there can never be scope for a democratic rule from the Islamic point of view. and Allah Ta'ala Knows Best Mufti Ebrahim Desai
From www.askimam.com
Original posting http://islam.tc/ask-imam/view.php?q=15522
Interesting enough this Imam left out such "VICES" as Freedom of speech, the right to vote, freedom to practice any religion, freedom to drive if you are a woman.
I find it also interesting the Imam brings up the topic of prostitution. In Islam there is a marriage of conveniance and pleasure called "mutah" marriage. It is where a man can be married for a day or a month, having sex, while also retaining his original bride. Islam has has done NOTHING MORE THAN LEGALIZE PROSTITUTION.
From http://www.al-islam.org/al-serat/muta/1.htm
"At least mut'a can be said to provide a legal structure which, when observed, prevents most of the well known problems and abuses connected with unregulated sexual relationships. "
Support Our Troops!! BRING THEM HOME
They mean more than standing like stooges between Muslim factions slaughtering one another.
Wednesday, July 26, 2006 -- J. Grant Swank, Jr.
Yes, real, caring support for our men and women in uniform is to bring them back home--soon. Blood will flow like rivers. That's the opposite of what Operation Iraqi Freedom dreamt of.
We had hopes of Iraqis coming out of their fear caves constructed under the palaces of Saddam Hussein.
We had prayed for their personal liberties, their cheers at election booths, their championing a constitution guaranteeing civility long hungered for.Now those dreams are fading quickly.
In their place, we are forced with facts. Muslims don't really know what civility is, let alone what democracy means. There are of course some that do. But they are silenced in the shadows because of the bellicose bloodthirsty.
CLick the link for entire article.
http://www.out2.com/copyroom/articles.asp?StoryKey=410965
Copyright © 2006 by J. Grant Swank, Jr. http://www.truthinconviction.us/weblog.php
joseph_swank@yahoo.com
ALLAH: "Fight, slay Unbelievers wherever ye find them.Seize them, beleaguer them, lie in wait for them in every stratagem of war."Qur'an, Sura 9:5
CHRIST: For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. John 3:16
Wednesday, July 26, 2006
Support Israel, online.
http://my.ynet.co.il/front/eng/
This link will take you to www.ynetnews.com where you can leave a small note supporting Israel, that will be seen on the website and on the Israeli media all across Israel. Shalom.
This link will take you to www.ynetnews.com where you can leave a small note supporting Israel, that will be seen on the website and on the Israeli media all across Israel. Shalom.
IRAQ WILL COLLAPSE UNDER DISUNITY
The dream is fading fast.
Wednesday, July 26, 2006 -- J. Grant Swank, Jr.
Blood will flow like rivers. That's the opposite of what Operation Iraqi Freedom dreamt of. We had hopes of Iraqis coming out of their fear caves constructed under the palaces of Saddam Hussein.
We had prayed for their personal liberties, their cheers at election booths, their championing a constitution guaranteeing civility long hungered for.Now those dreams are fading quickly.
In their place, we are forced with facts.
Muslims don't really know what civility is, let alone what democracy means.
There are of course some that do. But they are silenced in the shadows because of the bellicose bloodthirsty.The years have shackled once-children into mental cages of rifle toting and sword thrust.
They call themselves, not Iraqis, but Shiite Arabs or Sunni Arabs or Kurds but not united Iraqis. They never will.
Their animosities are so long-standing and so deep.Furthermore, go figure how long it takes to organize a local committee for constructing a peaceful neighborhood.
Now compare how much time and energy it takes to blow up that neighborhood in the middle of a sunlit afternoon. In addition, to the bloodthirsty it is much more of a thrill to see a neighborhood blown to smithereens than it is to show up for a committee meeting to elect neighborhood do-gooders.In America we have committees coming out of our ears.
We have commissions and goodwill clubs, civic organizations and help agencies. That is because we have a history of that. We also have a Judeo-Christian heritage that has taught us to love our neighbors as ourselves. We are not always good at doing that; but we still have that moral base. It's there. And it comes to the fore often to assist those stricken with calamity - not only in the US but also around the world.
However, in the Muslim country children are reared, not on community building, but on waking up in the morning to see a teen girl strung up to a gallows where the judge is going to tie her neck dry till her kicking legs become still. Boys and girls wander back to their houses with that impressed upon their minds forever.
The law has been seen through.
Click the link for entire article.
Copyright © 2006 by J. Grant Swank, Jr.
ALLAH: "Fight, slay Unbelievers wherever ye find them.Seize them, beleaguer them, lie in wait for them in every stratagem of war."Qur'an, Sura 9:5
CHRIST: For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. John 3:16
Tuesday, July 25, 2006
What's wrong with this picture?
Kofi Annon, shaking hands with the LEADER OF HEZBOLLAH.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1672212/posts <---- CLICK FOR ORIGINAL
POST AT FREEREPUBLIC.COM
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1672212/posts <---- CLICK FOR ORIGINAL
POST AT FREEREPUBLIC.COM
Destroy Islamo-Nazi's
For anyone reading this, understand one thing, evil must be destroyed.
Not coddled.
Not brought back into the fold.
Not negotiated with.
The Islamo-Nazi's that threaten our very Nations and way of life, must not be dealt with, wearing "kid gloves." Make no mistake, the Muslim terrorists want all non Muslims dead or to be submissive to the whims of Islam.
For those that wish to appease the Islamo-Nazis in order to "buy your way out", it won't work, it never has.
Never appease the alligator of Islam, you will only be eaten last.
I want the war on the Islamo-Nazis to be ONE SIDED. This is a war we can not lose.
We can have nothing less than TOTAL AND OUTRIGHT VICTORY.
"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream.
It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same,
or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children
what it was once like in the United States where men were free." ----Ronald Reagan
IRAQ = IRANIAN CLONE
Tue Jul 25, 2006
Grant Swank, Jr.
The Iraqi Prime Minister wants Sharia law, the dreaded “legal system” based on the Koran punishments of lashing, beheadings and burying in the dirt up to the chin, beating females and forced marriages. The PM wants to be friendly with Iran. The PM wants to support Hezballoh. The Iraqi constitution actually advocates the Sharia law base for settling court cases.
It is only a matter of time. When Iraq sees fit to oust the multinational forces (US-led Coalition) and stand on its own financially, Americans will find themselves the enemy. The friend to Iraq will be Iran.
The government in Iraq is actually overseen by the United Iraqi Alliance coalition that is pro-Iran. What then Operation Iraqi Freedom has seen through is another Muslim country sans Saddam Hussein aligned with the planet’s chief demon — Iran.
It is Iran that holds the world hostage with nuclear build up in order to invite its Islamic messiah to Earth in the midst of a holocaust. Put the pieces of the small puzzle together and you have the horror no one envisioned when the US-led Coalition entered Iraq.
US President George W. Bush along with numerous free nation leaders touted Islam as a “peace religion” when in fact it is a killing cult, not a world religion among religions. It is the only “religion” that demands non-devotees slain.
Iraqis do not understand nor want a democracy — by and large. They want what is most familiar to them — the brutal Muslim “way” which is the most cruel and barbaric system on the globe. Yet they want it and will slaughter one another to get it.
Iraqis do not consider themselves as “Iraqis” but as Sunni Arabs, Shiite Arabs, Kurds, etc. They don’t understand “unity” as understood in America, though during Operation Iraqi Freedom Americans in the main believed that they could be educated to define “democracy” and “personal freedoms” as is defined in the United States.
Not so. Not going to be.
Muslims live by the sword, their symbol. They have learned how to cut through for blood since childhood.
Muslim children witness daily public lashings in the town square, hangings from nooses tied to cranes and telephone poles along public roads, bodies buried up to their chins in dirt for their heads to be bashed in till dead, females beaten mercilessly, sometimes murdered by knife or bullet, and a male dominated milieu.
A demonic theocracy rules. There is no thought of separation of religion and government. They are one and the same. Islamic Koran governs the politics and the court systems.
Therefore, as American blood was spilt in Iraq to free the populace it has ended up to be warring among sectarian groups under Allah. These killers are teen-agers and young adults, mostly males, who brag on carrying knives and rifles, blowing up neighborhoods, even their own.
How could we expect these adolescents and adults to know anything but killing when that is what they have seen every day of their lives growing up under the Koran paragraphs of killing and maiming?
Islamic boys and girls played, not with blocks and Wal-Mart toys, but with rifles and suicide belts.
They watched murder techniques on children’s telecasts.
They were tutored in how to behead in torture schools.
They have blood in their dreams.
They see blood in their streets.
They live to die or spill blood.
Click the link for entire article. http://truthinconviction.us/weblog.php
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
