Posts
mosquewatch
Stumble It!
12/31/05
J. Grant Swank, Jr.
Germans are pro-active maximum these days in preventing Islamic killers international from taking over their country. They are not merely giving forth rhetoric. They are putting in place real-life real-time obstacles to prevent Allah zealots from murdering non-Muslim or making them slaves of Islam world rule.
There is no time to waste regarding every nation doing the same. Iran has already communicateD with Indonesia for the organization of Muslim nations worldwide in order to increase the latter’s strength.
Muslim leaders do nothing to castigate their own slaughtering fanatics. Therefore, it’s up to each freedom-based nation to protect itself. Germany is doing just that.
The latest move is to put MuslimS through a loyal test in order to become citizens. According to Kate Connolly in Berlin, reporter for news.telegraph, “German citizens will have to undergo a rigorous cultural test to gauge their views on subjects ranging from bigamy to homosexuality.”
Right now it is a two-hour oral exam already instituted the state of Baden-Wurttemberg.
Germans are also demanding “language proficiency skills and general knowledge.” In other words, German is the language within the country. Those becoming citizens are to learn that language. It is not going to be the other way around.
Muslims in some countries are demanding interpreters in workplace, airports, hospitals, clinics and schools rather than learn the language of the host country. Not so with Germany.
Further, those entering the German citizenship gate must prove that they are economically stable for themselves and any clan members.
In addition, one expecting to become a citizen must have lived in Germany eight years as well as have no criminal history.
“Germany’s 15 other states will monitor the progress of the policy when the tests begin this week before deciding whether they wish to adopt similar legislation.
“The 30 questions, which have been set by a special commission, range from sexual equality to school sports and are meant to trigger a more detailed discussion between the applicants and officials.
“Until now, all applicants have simply had to tick a Yes or No box to answer whether they felt loyalty to Germany.”
No more. The exam is detailed and must be completed and passed. Germany has had persons simply check YES for loyalty and then turn out to be anti-Germany Muslim infiltrators making trouble of one sort or another.
“They will be quizzed on their attitudes to homosexuality and western clothing for young women, and whether husbands should be allowed to beat their wives. Other questions covering topics such as bigamy and whether parents should allow their children to participate in school sports have been called ‘trick questions’, meant to catch people off guard.
“The state interior ministry said the test would be used to filter out Muslims who were unsuited for life in Germany. Those who answered ‘correctly’ but later acted against expected behavior, such as wife-beating, could have their citizenship removed.”
In Islam women are considered dung. They are conceived with ten curses. These curses are defined as exposing one’s genitals in public. If a female Muslim marries, one curse is lifted but the others remain. In other words, it would have been better for her never to have been born.
Muslim males may beat their women if the latter’s ankles are exposed. If males consider the female to have “dishonored” the clan, the woman can be murdered—slit throat, bullet in head.
If a Muslim woman is accused of adultery—whether she committed the act or not—she is to be stoned. See http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/ TheReligionOfPeace Picture of the Week depicting the burying of a female up to her chest in preparation for stoning her to death.
“Iran’s Islamic Penal Code is very specific about the manner of execution and types of stones which should be used for stoning sentences.
“Article 102 states that men will be buried up to their waists and women up to their breasts for the purpose of execution by stoning.
“Article 104 states, with reference to the penalty for adultery, that the stones used should ‘not be large enough to kill the person by one or two strikes, nor should they be so small that they could not be defined as stones.”
Germany wants none of this Muslim murder, discrimination, bloodletting, and anti-female disruption to its culture.
There are three million Muslims presently in Germany.
Of course, there are voices of opposition to the exam from Muslims elsewhere. They claim the exam is discriminatory. However, we have nothing to hear from them protesting their own murdering, maiming and committing suicide in order to undo other cultures. They are awesomely silent regarding their own atrocities.
But when a civil country wants to weed out the Muslim insane, then the Muslims elsewhere protest as if defending human rights and fighting discrimination. Their own religion, actually a killing cult, is laden with discrimination, particularly against females and Christians, Hindus and Jews.
“The European Assembly of Turkish Academics rejected the questionnaire as ‘strongly discriminatory and racist’ against Germany’s three million-strong Muslim population, most of whom are Turkish.
“Kerim Arpad, an assembly spokesman, said: ‘The test is shaped by stereotypes and damages integration.’
“But Dieter Biller, of the foreign ministry in Stuttgart, the state capital, said the test would help bureaucrats to form opinions as to whether citizenship applicants were suitable or not.
“‘It covers everything from sexual equality, violence, school sports and religious freedom. How the applicants stand on the question of the attacks of September 11 will also be a key question.’”
Visit: http://conservatown.com/2005/12/29/germany-muslim-attackers-tagged-electronically/
GERMANY: MUSLIM ATTACKERS TAGGED ELECTRONICALLY
Visit: http://conservatown.com/2005/12/29/germans-ban-islamic-%e2%80%98holy-war%e2%80%99/
GERMANS BAN MUSLIM ‘HOLY WAR’
Copyright © 2005 by J. Grant Swank, Jr.
Web: http://www.truthinconviction.us/weblog.php
Email: joseph_swank@yahoo.com
Saturday, December 31, 2005
Islam Cannot be Reformed!
by Mohammad Asghar(Date)
This short write up is in reference to Dr. Ali Sina’s article, titled “Eradication, not Reformation.” In it, he wrote: “Islam cannot be reformed, but it can be eradicated. If we work together, we will succeed.”
I fully endorse Dr. Sina’s observations and assert that Islam cannot be reformed for so long as the Quran would remain its guiding light. All the problems Muslims face and create for others today emanate from this caricature of all books; it is filled up not only with a lot of hatred, it is also a compilation that contains almost all the inanities a human can think of.
In this connection, it would be relevant to point out here that people did indeed try to reform Islam in the past, but they failed. This failure resulted from the Muslims’ unshakeable faith and belief in the Quran.
Let me quote here one well known fact:
Emperor Akbar was one of the most powerful rulers of pre-British India . He tried his best to unite the Hindu and Muslim population of his empire under one religious umbrella. To make his efforts successful, he did everything possible, including taking over 5,000 wives from different societies of the country.
Knowing that his subjects needed a religion in order to fulfill their religious longings, Emperor founded a new religion; he called “Deen-e-Akbari,” the Religion of Akbar. In it he combined all the humane and essential elements of Hinduism and Islam.
It was a very good move on Akbar’s part, for, people’s acceptance of it would have eliminated the need of Greta for the Hindus, and of the Quran for the Muslims. But his plan did not work, as both the religious groups of India refused to accept the doctrines he propounded through his religion.
Muslims were in the forefront of the movement that opposed “Deen-e-Akbari” as they knew the acceptance by them of this religion would have taken away the Quran, their Holy Book, from their lives. This they could not have done, even if their opposition to it was to cost them their lives. In the face of stiff opposition, Akbar gave up, and his effort to reform Islam, together with Hinduism, died in its cradle.
When an Emperor, like Akbar, having immense power and support of his imperial machineries at his disposal, did not succeed in reforming Islam, who else can afford to do it now and in future?
None! Islam would continue to maintain its ugly presence on earth, as it does today. If we want to save humanity from its baneful effect, the only thing we can do would be to eliminate the source of its strength. And the source is the Quran. It is evil; it teaches evil and it wants its believers to become evil.
Let us fight against this evil. In its elimination lies the well-being of mankind. Nothing short of it is going to make our world safe. So, let all the former Muslims and sensible Muslims and non-Muslims unite, and launch our united and concerted efforts against this monster. I hope we would prevail over it at the end, thus ushering in a new era in the lives of the world’s entire mankind.
Only the elimination of the Quran can change a sea of humanity, we call Muslims. Only their transformation from Islamism to humanism would make our world safe. Let us do it unitedly by unveiling the real face of Islam so that all Muslims can see for themselves its ugliness, a truth that has been beguiling them for almost fourteen hundred years.
Our future generations would thank us for our efforts and sacrifices. All of us will die one day. So why not fight the evil that turns humans into beasts, and leave our mark for our future generations to remember it with pride?
http://www.islam-watch.org/MAsghar/islam_cannot_be_reformed.htm
This short write up is in reference to Dr. Ali Sina’s article, titled “Eradication, not Reformation.” In it, he wrote: “Islam cannot be reformed, but it can be eradicated. If we work together, we will succeed.”
I fully endorse Dr. Sina’s observations and assert that Islam cannot be reformed for so long as the Quran would remain its guiding light. All the problems Muslims face and create for others today emanate from this caricature of all books; it is filled up not only with a lot of hatred, it is also a compilation that contains almost all the inanities a human can think of.
In this connection, it would be relevant to point out here that people did indeed try to reform Islam in the past, but they failed. This failure resulted from the Muslims’ unshakeable faith and belief in the Quran.
Let me quote here one well known fact:
Emperor Akbar was one of the most powerful rulers of pre-British India . He tried his best to unite the Hindu and Muslim population of his empire under one religious umbrella. To make his efforts successful, he did everything possible, including taking over 5,000 wives from different societies of the country.
Knowing that his subjects needed a religion in order to fulfill their religious longings, Emperor founded a new religion; he called “Deen-e-Akbari,” the Religion of Akbar. In it he combined all the humane and essential elements of Hinduism and Islam.
It was a very good move on Akbar’s part, for, people’s acceptance of it would have eliminated the need of Greta for the Hindus, and of the Quran for the Muslims. But his plan did not work, as both the religious groups of India refused to accept the doctrines he propounded through his religion.
Muslims were in the forefront of the movement that opposed “Deen-e-Akbari” as they knew the acceptance by them of this religion would have taken away the Quran, their Holy Book, from their lives. This they could not have done, even if their opposition to it was to cost them their lives. In the face of stiff opposition, Akbar gave up, and his effort to reform Islam, together with Hinduism, died in its cradle.
When an Emperor, like Akbar, having immense power and support of his imperial machineries at his disposal, did not succeed in reforming Islam, who else can afford to do it now and in future?
None! Islam would continue to maintain its ugly presence on earth, as it does today. If we want to save humanity from its baneful effect, the only thing we can do would be to eliminate the source of its strength. And the source is the Quran. It is evil; it teaches evil and it wants its believers to become evil.
Let us fight against this evil. In its elimination lies the well-being of mankind. Nothing short of it is going to make our world safe. So, let all the former Muslims and sensible Muslims and non-Muslims unite, and launch our united and concerted efforts against this monster. I hope we would prevail over it at the end, thus ushering in a new era in the lives of the world’s entire mankind.
Only the elimination of the Quran can change a sea of humanity, we call Muslims. Only their transformation from Islamism to humanism would make our world safe. Let us do it unitedly by unveiling the real face of Islam so that all Muslims can see for themselves its ugliness, a truth that has been beguiling them for almost fourteen hundred years.
Our future generations would thank us for our efforts and sacrifices. All of us will die one day. So why not fight the evil that turns humans into beasts, and leave our mark for our future generations to remember it with pride?
http://www.islam-watch.org/MAsghar/islam_cannot_be_reformed.htm
Honor Killing: Is it Islamic?
By Syed Kamran Mirza Syed_mirza@hotmail.com
Honor killings, which occur with shocking regularity in certain parts of the Middle East and South Asia, target women whose actions … actual or suspected … violate the honor of their family, an honor which is thought to depend on the sexual purity of its female members. Victims are always being killed/slaughtered mercilessly by her own family members.
Honor killing is a manifestation of global phenomenon in general and Muslim nations in particular. Since this terrible inhumane practice does exists only among the Muslims of the world—very often civilized people do blame Islam as the precursor of this dreadful act.
Most others do not agree with this notion at all; and they try to put the blame on the tribal/cultural practice, and do not consider Islam is anyway responsible for it. In this essay I shall analyze the real issues, cause and origin, and pattern of this heinous act amongst the Muslims of the world to postulate if there is any link, or incitements that originates from the very core of Islam.
What is honor killing?
Honor killing is the bone chilling horrific cruelty committed by the family members—father, mother, brothers, brother-in-laws, even in some cases own sisters also. In this terrible episode the victim is always the daughter/sister or other blood related young women who get killed. Perpetrators are always the family members stated above.
Family honor is one of the core values of Arab society. Anything from speaking with an unrelated man, to rumored pre-marital loss of virginity, to an extra-marital affair, refuses forced marriages; marry according to their will; or even women and girls who have been raped—can stain or destroy the family honor. Therefore, family members (parents, brothers, or sisters) kill the victim in order to remove the stain or maintain, and protect the honor of the family.
Killers are given light sentences, sometimes with little or no jail time at all. The killers mainly defend their act of murder by referring to the Koran and Islam. Family guardian will say that they are merely following the directives set down in their Islamic ethical beliefs.
These barbaric killings occur only to save the honor of the family, and not for any animosity or for wealth or gold. In 100% of cases—the killers have no animosity, rather they love the girl as their own daughter or sister, but they kill the girl anyway upon their ethical compulsion to save their family honor, or to erase family stigmas.
The victims cry, beg for their life but the family members become merciless (out of their ethical prejudices and also religious burden of fear) and kill the victim. After killing family members usually mourn and cry for the victim (usually loving daughter or sister) but feel solace that they have done the right thing to save their family honor.
http://www.islam-watch.org/SyedKamranMirza/honor_killing.htm
Honor killings, which occur with shocking regularity in certain parts of the Middle East and South Asia, target women whose actions … actual or suspected … violate the honor of their family, an honor which is thought to depend on the sexual purity of its female members. Victims are always being killed/slaughtered mercilessly by her own family members.
Honor killing is a manifestation of global phenomenon in general and Muslim nations in particular. Since this terrible inhumane practice does exists only among the Muslims of the world—very often civilized people do blame Islam as the precursor of this dreadful act.
Most others do not agree with this notion at all; and they try to put the blame on the tribal/cultural practice, and do not consider Islam is anyway responsible for it. In this essay I shall analyze the real issues, cause and origin, and pattern of this heinous act amongst the Muslims of the world to postulate if there is any link, or incitements that originates from the very core of Islam.
What is honor killing?
Honor killing is the bone chilling horrific cruelty committed by the family members—father, mother, brothers, brother-in-laws, even in some cases own sisters also. In this terrible episode the victim is always the daughter/sister or other blood related young women who get killed. Perpetrators are always the family members stated above.
Family honor is one of the core values of Arab society. Anything from speaking with an unrelated man, to rumored pre-marital loss of virginity, to an extra-marital affair, refuses forced marriages; marry according to their will; or even women and girls who have been raped—can stain or destroy the family honor. Therefore, family members (parents, brothers, or sisters) kill the victim in order to remove the stain or maintain, and protect the honor of the family.
Killers are given light sentences, sometimes with little or no jail time at all. The killers mainly defend their act of murder by referring to the Koran and Islam. Family guardian will say that they are merely following the directives set down in their Islamic ethical beliefs.
These barbaric killings occur only to save the honor of the family, and not for any animosity or for wealth or gold. In 100% of cases—the killers have no animosity, rather they love the girl as their own daughter or sister, but they kill the girl anyway upon their ethical compulsion to save their family honor, or to erase family stigmas.
The victims cry, beg for their life but the family members become merciless (out of their ethical prejudices and also religious burden of fear) and kill the victim. After killing family members usually mourn and cry for the victim (usually loving daughter or sister) but feel solace that they have done the right thing to save their family honor.
http://www.islam-watch.org/SyedKamranMirza/honor_killing.htm
Islamic Heaven
By Syed Kamran Mirza
Some so called modern Islamic apologists often try to fool the western infidels that Islam is a very simple religion and Islam never lures Muslims with erotic heavenly pleasures. Nothing could be furthest from the truth then this ridiculous claim of Islamists. Let’s examine very closely the facts about Islamic heaven.
If we research on the heavens of world’s five famous religions this is what we can learn: Both Judaism and Christianity talk about heaven but do not describe what is in there! Hinduism talks about heaven and give some earthly material pleasures but does not go any further. Buddhism does not believe in after-life, and do not have any hell or heaven. They believe hell and heaven exists on this earth.
But Islam emphatically describes many forms of heavens (at least 8 of them with various status/classes) with plenty of earthly greed’s and lusting/erotic pleasures which not many human beings (made of soil) can refuse to get it. Muslims devoutly pray at least five times (some pray even 10 times) a day, visit Mekka and fawns Pirs and Darbishes (Saints) just to get the ultimate ticket for those lustful happiness of heavens.
In my childhood I asked our Huzur (Imam of the Mosque) what exactly will be the likes of heavenly rewards from Allah for which all Muslims are fawning Allah by five times prayers per day, and fasting for one month. The Imam shaheb replied: “after your death you will be resurrected again as an healthy young man of 25 year old. There in the heaven you will be given beautiful Houris/Gillman, wine, and plenty of foods to eat. You will stay young for ever and death, disease will never come near you again.”
Folks, all those Islamic Mullahs, Maoulanas, all those Jihadis of Kashmir, Palestine, Osama-Bin-Laden’s terrorist gang, and all other gullible Muslims ardently believe just that.
http://www.islam-watch.org/SyedKamranMirza/IslamicHeaven.htm
Friday, December 30, 2005
German media: U.S. preparing Iran strike
The Bush administration is preparing its NATO allies for a possible military strike against suspected nuclear sites in Iran in the New Year, according to German media reports, reinforcing similar earlier suggestions in the Turkish media.
The Berlin daily Der Tagesspiegel this week quoted "NATO intelligence sources" who claimed that the NATO allies had been informed that the United States is currently investigating all possibilities of bringing the mullah-led regime into line, including military options. This "all options are open" line has been President George W Bush's publicly stated policy throughout the past 18 months.
But the respected German weekly Der Spiegel notes "What is new here is that Washington appears to be dispatching high-level officials to prepare its allies for a possible attack rather than merely implying the possibility as it has repeatedly done during the past year."
The German news agency DDP cited "Western security sources" to claim that CIA Director Porter Goss asked Turkey's premier Recep Tayyip Erdogan to provide political and logistic support for air strikes against Iranian nuclear and military targets. Goss, who visited Ankara and met Erdogan on Dec. 12, was also reported to have to have asked for special cooperation from Turkish intelligence to help prepare and monitor the operation.
http://www.wpherald.com/storyview.php?StoryID=20051230-124328-9385r
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1549392/posts
The Berlin daily Der Tagesspiegel this week quoted "NATO intelligence sources" who claimed that the NATO allies had been informed that the United States is currently investigating all possibilities of bringing the mullah-led regime into line, including military options. This "all options are open" line has been President George W Bush's publicly stated policy throughout the past 18 months.
But the respected German weekly Der Spiegel notes "What is new here is that Washington appears to be dispatching high-level officials to prepare its allies for a possible attack rather than merely implying the possibility as it has repeatedly done during the past year."
The German news agency DDP cited "Western security sources" to claim that CIA Director Porter Goss asked Turkey's premier Recep Tayyip Erdogan to provide political and logistic support for air strikes against Iranian nuclear and military targets. Goss, who visited Ankara and met Erdogan on Dec. 12, was also reported to have to have asked for special cooperation from Turkish intelligence to help prepare and monitor the operation.
http://www.wpherald.com/storyview.php?StoryID=20051230-124328-9385r
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1549392/posts
MUSLIM FEMALE BURIED FOR THE KILL
It is labeled “The Picture of the Week: Behold the Peace of Islam.”
Visit http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/ TheReligionOfPeace
There is an Islamic female. But she can be seen only from her chest up. The lower part of her body has already been buried beneath fresh dirt.
Apparently the dirt will continue to rise a few more inches.
Her countenance is laden with anguish.
One can tell that she is garbed in the traditional garb of Islamic women, except in this photograph her face is not hidden behind a veil. That is why her facial expression of sheer fear is obvious.
One man has a shovel in hand by which he is scooping up earth to throw against her frame. Another man is scooping up dirt with his bare hands.
It appears that there are at least two Islamic females assisting in the burying of the human being.
Weeds are in the photograph’s background. So it appears that the murder is taking place in apparently a vacant lot somewhere.
The caption to the visual reads: “Muslim countries have lower rates of adulteries.”
The message is that this Islamic woman has been accused of committing adultery. Therefore, she is going to be punished by stoning.
“Iran’s Islamic Penal Code is very specific about the manner of execution and types of stones which should be used for stoning sentences.
“Article 102 states that men will be buried up to their waists and women up to their breasts for the purpose of execution by stoning.
“Article 104 states, with reference to the penalty for adultery, that the stones used should ‘not be large enough to kill the person by one or two strikes, nor should they be so small that they could not be defined as stones.”
It is widely known that in Muslim countries there is much injustice. True, there is injustice worldwide for we live in a morally flawed sphere. However, it is daily occurrence maximum in Islamic countries.
Therefore, many times a Muslim female is accused of dishonoring her clan and put to death. Sometimes the accusation is that she committed adultery. Sometimes she did commit adultery; but at other times, it is but a hoax accusation and she is stoned nevertheless.
This is daily occurrence in Muslim communities. Children watch the stoning. Neighbors watch the stoning. Some enter into the stoning. It is the acceptable violence base to many neighborhoods. It is decreed by Muslim law to punish and therefore the Islamic punishment is public.
Web: http://www.truthinconviction.us/weblog.php
Email: joseph_swank@yahoo.com
THERE IS NO MODERATE ISLAM.
11:15 AM 12/30/2005
The mainstream news media and many of our politicians will use the phrases, "Moderate Islam" or "Fundamental Islam". There is only Islam, and it is indeed radical. Non Muslims, as well as Muslims constantly ask me ,"If Islam teaches to wage Jihad, why are not all Muslims doing it?".
Simple answer. They are.
In Arabic Al-Jihad bi-al-Lisan which means - Jihad of the Tongue, and al-Jihad bi-al-Qalam – Jihad of the Pen and Al-Jihad bi-al-Mal - the Financial Jihad. Muslims need not pick up and rpg or sword or fight for "Allah's cause". They can simply further the cause of Islam by writing about it, or speaking about it. Anything for the glory of Islam.
The other constant question is, "Why are not all Muslims homocide bombers?".
The same reason that everone in the USA is not a Policeman, or in the Military. Just because they don't join up, does not mean they don't support there ideas and goals.
To be a good Muslim, one should imitate Mohammed and his actions. And in fact the best Muslims are terrorists just as Mohammed was. It's in the Koran, and the Hadiths, and History backs everything up.
Jeff
The mainstream news media and many of our politicians will use the phrases, "Moderate Islam" or "Fundamental Islam". There is only Islam, and it is indeed radical. Non Muslims, as well as Muslims constantly ask me ,"If Islam teaches to wage Jihad, why are not all Muslims doing it?".
Simple answer. They are.
In Arabic Al-Jihad bi-al-Lisan which means - Jihad of the Tongue, and al-Jihad bi-al-Qalam – Jihad of the Pen and Al-Jihad bi-al-Mal - the Financial Jihad. Muslims need not pick up and rpg or sword or fight for "Allah's cause". They can simply further the cause of Islam by writing about it, or speaking about it. Anything for the glory of Islam.
The other constant question is, "Why are not all Muslims homocide bombers?".
The same reason that everone in the USA is not a Policeman, or in the Military. Just because they don't join up, does not mean they don't support there ideas and goals.
To be a good Muslim, one should imitate Mohammed and his actions. And in fact the best Muslims are terrorists just as Mohammed was. It's in the Koran, and the Hadiths, and History backs everything up.
Jeff
Fitzgerald: Jihad, Islam, and the Aryan Nations
Jihad Watch Board Vice President Hugh Fitzgerald discusses the alliance between the Aryan Nations and the global jihad:
A few selections from the Aryan Nations website:
“There never was a holocaust I wish there were but unfortunately it's nothing but another jewish fable, a holohoax as we call it, used to extort money out of countries, companies and anyone who will listen to the poor crying jews!”
“we are NOT adherents of the christian cult and we do not call ourselves christians!”
“When speaking of Aryan Islam, I'm referring to the spiritual and intellectual movement of those idealistic Aryan youth who embrace the TRUE Islam of the Qur'an and Sunnah. They include those who join or support the honorable warriors of Islam, the Mujahideen. We are an increasing number and can't be dismissed as "race-traitors" or any other labels attached to us by those who don't practice the TRUE National Socialism of honor and nobility.”
“‘...a link is created between Islam and National-Socialism on an open, honest basis. It will be directed in terms of blood and race from the North, and in the ideological-spiritual sphere from the East.’ - Obergruppenführer Gottlob Berger; 1942”
“There is much information on the respect and cooperation that Adolf Hitler and others of the Third Reich had for Islam. This would be a good read for all those that claim to be National Socialists…”
“The jew is a parasite, an enemy of our Western Civilization.”
“Islam is our ally, and the 1500 cults all claiming to be “Christian” are our opposition…”
http://jihadwatch.org/
A few selections from the Aryan Nations website:
“There never was a holocaust I wish there were but unfortunately it's nothing but another jewish fable, a holohoax as we call it, used to extort money out of countries, companies and anyone who will listen to the poor crying jews!”
“we are NOT adherents of the christian cult and we do not call ourselves christians!”
“When speaking of Aryan Islam, I'm referring to the spiritual and intellectual movement of those idealistic Aryan youth who embrace the TRUE Islam of the Qur'an and Sunnah. They include those who join or support the honorable warriors of Islam, the Mujahideen. We are an increasing number and can't be dismissed as "race-traitors" or any other labels attached to us by those who don't practice the TRUE National Socialism of honor and nobility.”
“‘...a link is created between Islam and National-Socialism on an open, honest basis. It will be directed in terms of blood and race from the North, and in the ideological-spiritual sphere from the East.’ - Obergruppenführer Gottlob Berger; 1942”
“There is much information on the respect and cooperation that Adolf Hitler and others of the Third Reich had for Islam. This would be a good read for all those that claim to be National Socialists…”
“The jew is a parasite, an enemy of our Western Civilization.”
“Islam is our ally, and the 1500 cults all claiming to be “Christian” are our opposition…”
http://jihadwatch.org/
EGYPT MAKES CHURCH REPAIRS EASIER
J. Grant Swank, Jr.
“Safwat El Baiady, president of the Protestant Churches of Egypt, told Compass Direct, a Christian news agency, that the decree ‘will solve almost 80 percent of our problems, rebuilding old churches, but we have to be very frank: It doesn’t solve all our problems.’”
Christians compose 7 to 10 million in Egypt, a primarily Muslim country.
It was an Ottomoan law going back to 1856 that governed if and when Christian church buildings could be repaired. It was the Hamayouni Decree.
Now Decree No. 291 does not necessitate Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak to grant repair requests. Previously, he had to personally approve of church repairs, even the simplest of repairs. Now the law has been updated.
That is because of standing requests and appeals and pleas from the Christian community over many years. Assisting the church community have been human rights groups attempting to lessen the discrimination against Christians in Egypt, according to Religion News Services’ Michele Chabin.
Now “the government with the decree has 30 days during which to approve church requests for renovations. Governors—the officials entrusted with making church-related decisions—must justify a rejection.”
In 2005, only 12 requests for church-related repairs were granted. This is recorded in the US State Department report for International Religious Freedom.
Ninety percent of Egypt’s Christian believers are Copts. They have consistently been discriminated against concerning church building renovations and building rights.
An example: “Jubilee Campaign, an interdenominational Christian human rights pressure group based in England, noted that permission has been denied for the last four years to build a toilet for St. Mary’s Church in El Kosai in Assiut Province.”
Further, as an example of purposefully blocking of Christian church presence in Egypt, Islamic fanatics have created “makeshift mosques near the site of planned churches or beside churches in need of repair, thereby giving the government a legal pretext for preventing construction or repair.”
Now one can understand all the more the following: “Safwat El Baiady, president of the Protestant Churches of Egypt, told Compass Direct, a Christian news agency, that the decree ‘will solve almost 80 percent of our problems, rebuilding old churches, but we have to be very frank: It doesn’t solve all our problems.’”
Copyright © 2005 by J. Grant Swank, Jr.
Web: http://www.truthinconviction.us/weblog.php
Email: joseph_swank@yahoo.com
“Safwat El Baiady, president of the Protestant Churches of Egypt, told Compass Direct, a Christian news agency, that the decree ‘will solve almost 80 percent of our problems, rebuilding old churches, but we have to be very frank: It doesn’t solve all our problems.’”
Christians compose 7 to 10 million in Egypt, a primarily Muslim country.
It was an Ottomoan law going back to 1856 that governed if and when Christian church buildings could be repaired. It was the Hamayouni Decree.
Now Decree No. 291 does not necessitate Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak to grant repair requests. Previously, he had to personally approve of church repairs, even the simplest of repairs. Now the law has been updated.
That is because of standing requests and appeals and pleas from the Christian community over many years. Assisting the church community have been human rights groups attempting to lessen the discrimination against Christians in Egypt, according to Religion News Services’ Michele Chabin.
Now “the government with the decree has 30 days during which to approve church requests for renovations. Governors—the officials entrusted with making church-related decisions—must justify a rejection.”
In 2005, only 12 requests for church-related repairs were granted. This is recorded in the US State Department report for International Religious Freedom.
Ninety percent of Egypt’s Christian believers are Copts. They have consistently been discriminated against concerning church building renovations and building rights.
An example: “Jubilee Campaign, an interdenominational Christian human rights pressure group based in England, noted that permission has been denied for the last four years to build a toilet for St. Mary’s Church in El Kosai in Assiut Province.”
Further, as an example of purposefully blocking of Christian church presence in Egypt, Islamic fanatics have created “makeshift mosques near the site of planned churches or beside churches in need of repair, thereby giving the government a legal pretext for preventing construction or repair.”
Now one can understand all the more the following: “Safwat El Baiady, president of the Protestant Churches of Egypt, told Compass Direct, a Christian news agency, that the decree ‘will solve almost 80 percent of our problems, rebuilding old churches, but we have to be very frank: It doesn’t solve all our problems.’”
Copyright © 2005 by J. Grant Swank, Jr.
Web: http://www.truthinconviction.us/weblog.php
Email: joseph_swank@yahoo.com
YES, MUSLIMS ARE SUSPECT, THEREFORE, SUSPECTED
J. Grant Swank, Jr.
“’If you were looking [for] the needle in a haystack, that’s the haystack you would look at,’ the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity because the program is classified. ‘You’d look at the [likely] targets and the places the operators were.’”
Web: http://www.truthinconviction.us/weblog.php
Email: joseph_swank@yahoo.com
“’If you were looking [for] the needle in a haystack, that’s the haystack you would look at,’ the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity because the program is classified. ‘You’d look at the [likely] targets and the places the operators were.’”
With that, the US officialdom told press that it is not focusing particularly on Muslims when “secretly testing radiation levels around the country.”
I ask: Why not?
Muslim fanatics are cultists—a part of a killing cult. Civilized countries put down killing cults. They don’t permit them to exist alongside legitimate religions.
The other world religions do not advocate murdering persons who do not agree with their religious tenets. Islam decrees, according to the Koran’s Allah, that non-Muslims be murdered or become slaves of Muslims. There are scores of sentences in the Koran stating just that—repeatedly.
Therefore, Muslim zealots who claim to be totally loyal to the Koran and the Koran’s deity live out that tenet. They live it out, even if it means they die for it. Therefore, they are self-pronounced members of a killing cult.
Judaism, Christianity, Shintoism, Buddhism, Hinduism and other world religions espouse their teachings but none of their doctrines propose that non-devotees be slain. Islam decrees that as a top priority if one is going to be a practicing Muslim, loyal to the faith.
Therefore, with increasing numbers of Muslims, many zealots, in the United States, Americans should expect the government to have a state-of-the-art surveillance particularly focused on anything Muslim—mosques, meeting places, clerics’ homes, webmaster offices of Muslim sites, and so forth. This is so particularly with the illegals influx overtaking the country; many of these illegals are Muslim zealots, some outright criminals with histories.
Elsewhere in the world there are training schools where Muslim instructors teach boys and girls how to hate and kill. Why should not Americans presume that such instructions go on in this country—under cover perhaps, but nevertheless, taking place?
Therefore, when these so-called human rights groups protest the government surveillance, they are siding with the enemy that is out to undo the human rights groups. The same with the liberal media and liberal politicians. They are planning their own demise for the Islamic zealots they are protecting are out to kill them off. Anything non-Muslim in the US must go. Islam’s world rule is the decree of the Islamic cultists. There is nothing less to their creed.
That is why non-Muslims must realize that this war global is not politic against politic. It is democracy versus a killing cult. Some would say it is politic versus “religion.” But more precisely, it is politic versus killing cult. That is the plain truth and the Muslims themselves would acknowledge that. It is the non-Muslims who sadly have not come to that stark awareness yet.
Therefore, better late than never, the Pentagon officialdom is finally getting around to studying the theology of Islam. That should have been put in place prior to Operation Iraqi Freedom. But, again, better late than never.
“Faced with angry complaints, U.S. officials defended an anti-terrorism program yesterday that secretly tested radiation levels around the country - including at more than 100 Muslim sites in the Washington area - and insisted that no one was targeted because of his or her faith.
“One official knowledgeable about the program explained that Muslim sites were included because al-Qaeda terrorists were considered likely to gravitate to Muslim neighborhoods or mosques while in the United States.
“’If you were looking [for] the needle in a haystack, that’s the haystack you would look at,’ the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity because the program is classified. ‘You’d look at the [likely] targets and the places the operators were.
“The focus on the Muslim sites, which was first reported last week by U.S. News & World Report, has stunned and angered officials at mosques and Muslim and Arab-American organizations. Two such groups have filed Freedom of Information requests, known as FOIAs, in recent days to try to learn which sites were monitored. They also have requested meetings with the FBI, which ran the program along with the Energy Department.”
“’The problem [is] … it further gives the Muslim community a sense they are suspect, they are under the gun,’ said Ahmed Younis, national director of the Muslim Public Affairs Council.” This is according go The Washington Post’s Mary Beth Sheridan.
And why should not they be suspect? That’s the question that should be answered in your face to the Muslims and liberals in America. They are suspect because they are suspected. Take a look around the globe at Muslim murderers global and that should answer the question.
Copyright © 2005 by J. Grant Swank, Jr.
Web: http://www.truthinconviction.us/weblog.php
Email: joseph_swank@yahoo.com
Thursday, December 29, 2005
Muslim Violence Visuals Daily Occurrence
J. Grant Swank, Jr.
Why should Muslims in Muslim countries fear blood, death and mutilation when it is daily visual occurrence?
To grow up in a country where humans are mistreated in public by the government is to conclude that mistreating humans is legitimate. These kinds of horrific lessons are taught every day in Muslim nations where human existence is cheap.
For instance, according to Iran Focus, on December 28 two Iranians were hung in public in Ahwax. This event was made official in the country’s state news agency.
While children and adults watched, “two men, identified only by their fist names as Naeem-Abdollah and Jaleel, were accused of being ‘mohareb,’” that is, persons who “’waged war on God.’”
The two men were led to the city square. There the nooses were tied around their necks. There the neighbors were witness to two human beings hanging from ropes. This is legitimate, according to the country’s judiciary.
The press release did not specify how these two mortals “’waged war on God.’” God, of course, in Iran, is defined as the Koran’s Allah. There are many sentences in the Koran stipulating how one can bring down the wrath of Allah, thus suffering death penalty by hanging or other means. Presumably, these two Iranians did just that so as to bring their lives to an end at the hanging post.
The media simply explained: “In the past, Iran’s judiciary has executed political opponents of the Islamic Republic on the charge of being a mohareb. The two men were hanged at dawn in one of the city’s main squares.”
The only clue that outsiders might get for the “reason” for the hangings is that perchance the two men contested something governmental. The press did give this data: “Ahwaz, provincial capital of Khuzistan, is home to Iran’s ethnic Arab population and has been a hotbed of anti-government demonstrations. Throughout the months of April and July, the city was the scene of large-scale clashes between people and government forces.”
Could it be that these two who met their end at the officials’ dictate were demonstrators against Iranian evils? Could they have been involved in “anti-government demonstrations?” Could they have been defenders of public liberties?
It is known that there is a growing youth movement within Iran that contests the killing cultic theocracy there. These youths, often students, have formed organizations outside the country in order to bring attention to the Iranian officials’ atrocities against Iranians.
One such organization is the Student Movement Coordination Committee for Democracy in Iran. Visit http://www.daneshjoo.org/
Whatever the definition of “war on God,” two Iranians were put to death before the waiting public at early dawn.
Further, according to Iran Focus, in the southern town of Jahrom, Iranian officials “flogged three men in public.” This was reported by the state-owned daily.
These were young males who remained unnamed in the media release. However, the watching public could see clearly what was leveled against them because of their “drinking” and “unruly behavior,” stated the daily Etemaad.
With that, the men were flogged 300 times.
Neighbors watched in the town’s Velayat Square as judiciary officials looked on to make sure the 300 count was complete.
Thus is life in Iran.
http://www.truthinconviction.us/weblog.php
Schoolgirl recounts Muslim beheadings of three Christian teens in Indonesia
J. Grant Swank, Jr. December 28, 2005
"’I tell people: Do not retaliate; only God can do that,’ said Rev. Stephen Dayoh, taking a break from pitching a large tent outside his church for Christmas services. ‘If we do, it means we are the same as them.’"
Muslim machetes cut off the heads of three Christian teenage girls. A fourth girl fled, according to AP.
"’All I could do was pray to Jesus for his help,’ said 16-year-old Noviana Malewa, who fled with a gaping head wound. ‘I was streaming with blood.’ A thick scar runs from the back of her neck to just under her right eye.
"Noviana's family, which fled the hamlet overlooking Poso, had recently returned, confident that tensions were subsiding. Still recovering from the attack, the girl now lives under police guard in the Christian town of Tentena.
"In her only interview since the killings, Noviana described how the girls in their school uniforms were taking a shortcut to school through jungle and plantations when they ran into at least five masked, black-clad men.
As she fled bleeding, the assailants collected her friends' heads, put them into black plastic bags and then dumped in Christian parts of Poso, one on a porch, the other two on the street.
"’They were killed as if they were chickens,’ said Hernius Morangki, showing a reporter the spot where his daughter was decapitated. ‘I keep asking myself, what were my daughter's sins?’
"Christians, who represent just 5 percent of the country's overall population of 220 million, have refrained from loudly demanding justice.
"Muslim militants are blamed for the October killings, the most gruesome yet in a campaign of terror against Christians on the island of Sulawesi.
More than 1,000 Christians there have been slain by Muslims.
"’They want to see Poso become alive with the spirit of jihad,’ said Fahirin Ibnu Achmad, an Afghan-trained militant.
"Also close by is heavily Muslim southern Thailand, where a two-year insurgency has left more than 1,100 dead.
"The United States is closely watching Indonesia, where Jemaah Islamiyah militants are accused of carrying out a string of suicide bombings on Western targets since 2002, including attacks on the island of Bali that killed more than 220 people, most of them foreign tourists."
Yes, the US had better take note. No wonder the surveillance current in America. May US President George W. Bush not cower to the liberal press and other secularists who join in with Muslims in favor of Islam world rule.
Sleeper cells are rampant. Four thousand Muslim web sites are in cyberspace spewing hate. Mosques are often managed by clerics teaching murder and rape. The Koran’s killing passages are taken most seriously by Muslim murderers globally.
Yet the liberal media will not use the "M" word when recounting Islamic killers’ atrocities. They are instead called "insurgents" or "terrorists." It’s time for politicians, lawmakers, judges, media and clergy to name Muslim murderers as Muslim murderers. It is time to use the "M" word daily in order to warn the planet of the Allah worshipers take over agenda.
The Muslim machete-carrying slayers leaped out from behind a wall of tall grass. Before the Christian girls could run for their lives, their heads were separated from their necks. The Christian pastor advocates not retaliating in like kind but to follow the spirit of Jesus. Jesus told His own that they would be persecuted for righteousness’ sake. He told them to pray for their enemies, do good for their enemies and pray to God that the enemies would experience a conversion of love and grace.
Christians in freedom-based countries sometimes have no idea of the persecution taking place against their own brothers and sisters elsewhere, particularly those living among Muslim haters. Muslims are taught to kill non-Muslims. Cowardly Muslims who do not do so are to be slain as well. Christians worldwide must enter into prayerful intercessions for the persecuted elsewhere.
"’I tell people: Do not retaliate; only God can do that,’ said Rev. Stephen Dayoh, taking a break from pitching a large tent outside his church for Christmas services. ‘If we do, it means we are the same as them.’"
Copyright © 2005 by J. Grant Swank, Jr.(posted with permission)
For More Information On This Story Visit: truthinconviction.us/weblog.php
Good Muslims Kill
Alas, Islam was not all murder, plunder, and lust. There was war. Tabari VII:105 “In this year there was the expedition of the Messenger to Uhud. In year three of the Islamic Era (March, 625) the Quraysh were provoked against the Messenger because he had killed their nobles and chiefs at Badr.” The Meccans had witnessed the prophet’s demented behavior at the pit. “Muhammad has bereaved us and killed our best men. So help us defend ourselves against him and perhaps we will obtain vengeance for those he has slain.”
They wanted to prevent the onslaught from continuing. Yet today, Muslims raise shrill voices protesting that Uhud was proof that the Meccans were the aggressors and that Muhammad was forced into defending his flock. But their own scriptures say otherwise, putting Islam in a difficult position. If these Hadiths are accurate, their prophet was a warmongering terrorist and a ruthless pirate. But if these Traditions are not true, they have no prophet and thus no religion—for nothing else is known about him or of Islam’s beginnings. While we are on the subject, I’d like to bring your attention to the format I have been using to present the events that comprise the Islamic Era. I have woven the Hadiths of Ishaq, Tabari, and Bukhari together with the Qur’an because I want you to appreciate the similarities between the four sources. Although there are some subtle differences, all four paint the same portrait, and it’s the only picture of Muhammad and his Companions that can be drawn. Nothing predates these books. Any statement about Muhammad or Islam that contradicts what you are reading is opinion—either wishful thinking or purposeful deception. That said, occasionally some positive words are sprinkled in amidst the horror; although they are few and far apart. For example: Tabari VII:106 “Abd Allah al-Jumahi had been treated kindly by the Messenger on the day of Badr, being a poor man with daughters. He was among the captives, and said, ‘Muhammad, I am a poor family man with needs of which you are aware; so treat me well.’ The Prophet treated him kindly.” I suppose that it bears mentioning that he was a pagan named Slave-to-Allah. Being poor, he was of no value to the “profit.” And the only reason he was a prisoner in Medina was because he was kidnapped during a Muslim raid. The following chat allegedly took place between a militant and his victim. Tabari VII:106 “Abu Azzah, you are a poet, so aid us with your tongue. Join our expedition and I swear before Allah I will make you a rich man.’” The first Muslims were mercenaries. According to the Sira: Ishaq:372 “The opinion of Abd Allah bin Ubayy was the same as the Prophet. He should not go out to meet the Meccans camped near Uhud. Yet some [the soon-to-be dead] Muslims whom Allah ennobled with martyrdom on the day of Uhud and others who had missed Badr jumped at the chance to fight. Yet Abd Allah said, ‘We have never gone out of Medina to meet an enemy but that they have inflicted severe losses on us; and no enemy has ever entered Medina but that we inflicted severe losses on them. Leave them alone.’” Abd Allah laid out the perils of invading a city. “If they enter Medina, the men will fight them face to face, and the women and boys will hurl stones at them from above. They will retreat, wishing they had not come.” But unfortunately, Muhammad had oversold his ability to command angelic help as well as the value of martyrdom. The newly minted Muslims roared: “O Messenger of Allah, do not deprive us of Paradise!” Bukhari:V4B52N61 “My uncle Anas said, ‘Allah’s Apostle! We were absent from the first battle you fought against the pagans. If Allah gives us a chance to do battle, no doubt, He will see how bravely we fight.’” Unable to give Muslims a reason to live, Muhammad gave them a reason to die. Bukhari:V4B52N72 “The Prophet said, ‘Nobody who enters Paradise likes to go back to the world even if he got everything on the earth, except a Mujahid [Islamic fighter] who wishes to return so that he may be martyred ten times because of the dignity he receives.’ Our Prophet told us about the message of Allah: ‘Whoever among us is killed will go to Paradise.’ Umar asked the Prophet, ‘Is it not true that our men who are killed will go to Paradise and those of the Pagan’s will go to Hell?’ The Prophet said, ‘Yes.’” Bukhari:V4B52N73 “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘Know that Paradise is under the shade of swords.’”
http://www.prophetofdoom.net/chapter17.html
Background into Islam
The Messenger and the MessageBy Abdullah Al Araby
MOHAMMED
Mohammed was born A.D. 570 into a highly regarded family from the respected tribe of Qoraysh. His father died before his birth and his mother died when he was only six years old. When he was eight, his grandfather Abd Al Muttalib also died, leaving him in the care of his uncle, Abu Talib.As a young man, Mohammed was exposed to the various sects of Christianity and Judaism. He observed how they were constantly arguing and debating each other. This may have influenced his disenchantment with the traditional polytheistic religion of the Arabs at the time.
MOHAMMED
Mohammed was born A.D. 570 into a highly regarded family from the respected tribe of Qoraysh. His father died before his birth and his mother died when he was only six years old. When he was eight, his grandfather Abd Al Muttalib also died, leaving him in the care of his uncle, Abu Talib.As a young man, Mohammed was exposed to the various sects of Christianity and Judaism. He observed how they were constantly arguing and debating each other. This may have influenced his disenchantment with the traditional polytheistic religion of the Arabs at the time.
Mohammed later referred to Christians and Jews as "People of the Book." (In reference to the Bible)At age 25, Mohammed started working for the rich widow Khadija, who later married him. She was 15 years older than he. He then became a successful merchant.At age 40, Mohammed spent much time in meditation, and proclaimed that he was selected by God to preach the true religion.Mohammed very soon faced harassment and persecution from the tribal chiefs who saw the new religion as a danger to the city's principal source of revenue. They feared that it would eliminate the profitable pilgrimages to the pagan shrine of the Kaaba.
In the year A.D. 622, after an attempt by his opponents to murder him, Mohammed and his few followers fled to Yathrib (later named Medina) in a migration known as the Hijira.In Medina, Mohammed's followers grew in strength and number. From there he began a series of raids on the city of Mecca. Ultimately he subjugated the city and brought all of Arabia under his control.Mohammed died in the year A.D. 632.
ISLAM
The Arabie word "Islam" means "submission" [to God]. Islam claims that it was never a new religion, but rather a continuation and culmination of God's revelations to Noah, Abraham, Moses and Jesus.To become a Muslim, one must accept and declare the creed of Islam, commonly known as the two professions of the faith. These are, "there is no other God but Allah, and Mohammed is the messenger of Allah." A Muslim then must believe in six articles of faith: God, the Angels, the Scriptures, the Prophets, the Day of Judgment, and Fatalism.
A Muslim must perform five religious duties known as "The Pillars of Islam," which are: The Professions, Prayer, Almsgiving, Fasting, and Pilgrimage to Mecca. Some have raised the Quranic sanction of Holy War (Jihad) for the spread of Islam to the rank of a sixth religious duty.It is interesting to note that much of Islam's practices and rituals were borrowed from the pre-Islamic pagan Arabs. This is the period that Muslims refer to as "al-Jahilyya" (Ignorance Age). Some of these rituals are: exalting the Kaaba and the Black Stone, pilgrimage to Mecca, fasting Ramadan, dedicating Friday for assembling to worship, and adopting the name "Allah" for God.
JIHAD (HOLY WAR)
"Jihad" is an Arabic word which means "struggle."Jihad can mean striving to be a better Muslim. The most common meaning, however, is fighting for Allah. In this sense Jihad is the struggle for the cause of spreading Islam, using all means available to Muslims, including force. This kind of Jihad is often referred to as "Holy War."
In resorting to force, Muslims do not have a problem finding passages in the Quran and Hadith that will not only condone violence, but also demand it.In the Quran, Allah orders Muslims to terrorize non-Muslims in His behalf:
"Strike terror (into the hearts of) the enemies of Allah and your enemies." Surah 8:60
"Fight (kill) them (non Muslims) and Allah will punish (torment) them by your hands, cover them with shame."Surah 9:14
"I will instil terror into the hearts of the unbelievers, smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them. It is not ye who slew them; it was Allah." Surah 8:12-17
"O ye who believe! Fight the unbelievers...let them find firmness (harshness) in you and know that Allah is with those who fear Him." Surah 9:123
In the Hadith (Mohammed's sayings), Mohammed also urges Muslims to practice Jihad.Mohammed once was asked: what is the best deed for the Muslim next to believing in Allah and His Apostle? His answer was: "To participate in Jihad in Allah's cause."Al-Bukhari vol 1:25 . Mohammed was also quoted as saying: "I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, none has the right to be worshipped but Allah." Al-Bukhari vol 4:196It is worth noting here that the words "fight" and "kill" have appeared in the Quran more frequently than the word "pray."Islam teaches that people are divided into two different camps; Dar al Harb (The abode of war), and Dar al Islam (The abode of Islam).
Those who belong to Dar al Islam are the Muslims who are in a constant state of war with Dar al Harb who are the non-Muslims, until such time the non-Muslims convert to Islam. In other words, Muslims can never peacefully co-exist with non-muslims.
Entire Article Here : http://www.islamreview.com/articles/background.shtml
What is the cost of practicing Islam?
By Mumin Salih
RECENTLY, there have been many writings trying to explain why Muslims in general tend to underachieve compared to others. It is ironic that Muslims own the largest oil reserves in the world but their countries remain underdeveloped.
You can read this article by Thierry Gattuso addressing the same issue. Apparently, the article was read by a Muslim intellectual who came up with the solution that more Islam is needed. You can read the comments of Ali Sina on the response of Muslims to the crisis in this article.
Muslims seem to behave like drug addicts who always need more of the same stuff to relieve their withdrawal symptoms. Muslims just cannot face the crisis head on and cure themselves from this seventh century ideology; instead, they ask for more. This stimulated me to write this essay about the price we are paying for practicing Islam and the price humanity has paid for keeping Islam alive for so long.
Although I am not an economist, I delved into this topic to highlight the sheer economic non-sense inherent in Islam. This analysis will remind us of some idea of what sort of money we are talking about, rather than being an accurate estimate of the price that the Muslims pay for practicing their faith. Mind you, in this analysis, I have not even taken into account the price we are paying for jihad because all the money in the world does not bring back one lost life. Mohammed ruled in Medina for only ten years, during which he fought over seventy aggressive wars! This tradition of Islamic warfare continued immediately after his death and has been continuing up to our time.
Entire article here : http://www.islam-watch.org/MuminSalih/PriceofIslam.htm
Wednesday, December 28, 2005
Allah's Theory on Human Sexes
By Imran Hossain21 January, 2004
We learn from the divine book
Sura Al Qiyama
75:36: Does man think that he will be left uncontrolled, (without purpose)?
75:37: Was he not a small seed in the seminal elements?
75:38: Then he was a clot of blood, so He created (him) then made (him) perfect
75:39:
And of him He made two sexes, male and female. Let’s see some problems:
However, human beings are not categorised only into tow sexes: male and female, but also either androgynous or another sex, which is called “hermaphrodite” in biological term. And this is divided into three groups: True, Male Pseudo and Female Pseudo. However, likewise all are genuine. People of those categories are very few in all around the world. They are biologically or physically different from both male and female group. But, hermaphrodites are members of the same human species. Allah does/can not make them in His process what we just saw in above verses. Now dear readers, which one is correct to you on human genders: almighty Allah’s theory or biological theory?
Anyways, there are a lot of instructions and guidelines in Islam which are applied upon sexes. Therefore, what would be hermaphrodites’ right path according to Allah’s doctrine or Islam?
Can hermaphrodites become Imam (who leads prayer) or Moaj-jem (who announces Azan) at the Masques?
Do they need to use Hijab/Borkha to veil themselves where ladies do?
Do they have right to build up and lead any Madrasah, or Majar Sharif? (For example, Ajmir Sharif in India)
Are they allowed to arrange Janaja (funeral), Miryad or Khutba (reciting in Islamic party/ programme)?
Are they allowed to go to Masque? If so, who do they join in with: brothers or sisters?
If some of them live in a hard-core Islamic Country like Saudi Arabia, are they allowed to hang out on the street without any man or Botkha?
Can they sacrifice/slaughter animals for Halal purpose where men do?
Do they have right to lead Hajj in Kaba Sharif?
What will they be awarded in the heaven: 72 virgin ladies or some young stronger guys?
Religion in general and Islam in particular make the human species morally imperfect. In poorer countries, hermaphrodites are often being ignored and socially tortured only because of religion. That’s why most of them are forced to become nomad. However, hermaphrodites have typical normal life in the West and some East Asian countries where religion is insignificant.
Conversely, Allah (swt) easily makes discrimination amongst human beings. Allah is here completely racist that He would furnish appropriate celestial gifts to His true male and female followers only. But, most merciful Allah completely backs off hermaphrodites. What a sympathetic God!!! Hermaphrodites have no guidance in social life and gifts in afterlife from compassionate Allah. http://www.islam-watch.org/ImranHossain/allahs_theory_on_human_sexes
IRAQ:Christians Fear Muslims
By J. Grant Swank, Jr.MichNews.comDec 28, 2005
Christians form a small community in New Iraq. They are daily threatened by Muslim murderers global who want to rip apart the new democracy planting. Therefore, Islamic killers international go after Christian believers, particularly their clergy and churches.
Therefore, Christmastide was no different, except that Christians took added precautions. One congregation did not celebrate Christmas Eve worship near midnight for fear of the church being burnt to the ground or worshipers being attacked by Allah zealots.
Therefore, earlier in the evening worship, they blew out the candles. The clergy then said to the congregation, "Let us now imagine that it is midnight and we are observing candlelight communion."
Stephen Ferrell for TimesOnLine reports that in one location Midnight Mass had to be cancelled because the congregation feared bomb blasts. With these daily apprehensions, many Christians have left New Iraq to live elsewhere. Entire story here :
And the Muslims get upset over a cartoon.....
America’s Earliest Terrorists
By Joshua E. London
At the dawn of a new century, a newly elected United States president was forced to confront a grave threat to the nation — an escalating series of unprovoked attacks on Americans by Muslim terrorists. Worse still, these Islamic partisans operated under the protection and sponsorship of rogue Arab states ruled by ruthless and cunning dictators.
Sluggish in recognizing the full nature of the threat, America entered the war well after the enemy’s call to arms. Poorly planned and feebly executed, the American effort proceeded badly and at great expense — resulting in a hastily negotiated peace and an equally hasty declaration of victory.
At the dawn of a new century, a newly elected United States president was forced to confront a grave threat to the nation — an escalating series of unprovoked attacks on Americans by Muslim terrorists. Worse still, these Islamic partisans operated under the protection and sponsorship of rogue Arab states ruled by ruthless and cunning dictators.
Sluggish in recognizing the full nature of the threat, America entered the war well after the enemy’s call to arms. Poorly planned and feebly executed, the American effort proceeded badly and at great expense — resulting in a hastily negotiated peace and an equally hasty declaration of victory.
As timely and familiar as these events may seem, they occurred more than two centuries ago. The president was Thomas Jefferson, and the terrorists were the Barbary pirates. Unfortunately, many of the easy lessons to be plucked from this experience have yet to be fully learned.
The Barbary states, modern-day Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, and Libya, are collectively known to the Arab world as the Maghrib (“Land of Sunset”), denoting Islam’s territorial holdings west of Egypt. With the advance of Mohammed’s armies into the Christian Levant in the seventh century, the Mediterranean was slowly transformed into the backwater frontier of the battles between crescent and cross. Battles raged on both land and sea, and religious piracy flourished.
The Maghrib served as a staging ground for Muslim piracy throughout the Mediterranean, and even parts of the Atlantic. America’s struggle with the terror of Muslim piracy from the Barbary states began soon after the 13 colonies declared their independence from Britain in 1776, and continued for roughly four decades, finally ending in 1815.
Although there is much in the history of America’s wars with the Barbary pirates that is of direct relevance to the current “war on terror,” one aspect seems particularly instructive to informing our understanding of contemporary Islamic terrorists. Very simply put, the Barbary pirates were committed, militant Muslims who meant to do exactly what they said.
Entire article here : http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/london200512160955.asp
Islam’s Nazi Connections
An essay adapted by Robert Locke from Dr. Serge Trifkovic’s new book The Sword of the Prophet: A Politically-Incorrect Guide to Islam.
One of the good things one can truthfully say about Islam is that there has never been any love lost between Moslems and Marxists. Sadly, the opposite end of the totalitarian political spectrum is quite another matter. SS chief Heinrich Himmler was known to remark that he regretted that Germany had adopted Christianity, rather than "warlike" Islam, as its religion, and there is a disturbing amount of twisted but very real logic in his remark.
One of the good things one can truthfully say about Islam is that there has never been any love lost between Moslems and Marxists. Sadly, the opposite end of the totalitarian political spectrum is quite another matter. SS chief Heinrich Himmler was known to remark that he regretted that Germany had adopted Christianity, rather than "warlike" Islam, as its religion, and there is a disturbing amount of twisted but very real logic in his remark.
Beyond the obvious dislike of a certain other religion, we have the plain fact that both Nazism and Islam both openly aim at world conquest. Both demand the total subordination of the free will of the individual – the very word "Islam" means submission in Arabic. Both are explicitly anti-nationalist and believe in the liquidation of the nation-state in favor of a "higher" community: in Islam the umma or community of all believers; in Nazism the herrenvolk or master race.
Both believe in undemocratic leadership by a privileged knower of an absolute, eternal, and ultimately mystical truth: the caliph or führer respectively. To be fair, in strict Nazism Arabs are racial Semites and thus subhumans, but as Robert Locke has written, the Nazis did not really believe in their racial mythology when they found it inconvenient, and they exploited their commonalities with Islam for all they were worth. If the British army had not stopped Rommel in the sands of El Alamein in 1942, preventing him from conquering the Middle East, the consequences for world history might have been dramatic. What did happen was quite ugly enough.
The Nazis began by attempting to exploit Arab resentment of the British and French colonial rule that they were under during the 1930’s, colonial rule which, in light of the subsequent bloody and tyrannical history of the region, it is hard to condemn today as worse than the likely alternative. The promised the Arabs "liberation" from the French and British, a promise which the naïve Arabs, not grasping the character of a Nazi regime that would likely have reduced them to slaves in its own empire, took at face value. This gave rise to a curious Arab ditty rendered in English thus:
Entire article here :http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=4934
"No more monsieur,
No more mister.
In heaven Allah,
On earth Hitler."
Radioactive Mosques?
By Robert SpencerFrontPageMagazine.com December 28, 2005
New revelations that federal officials are checking mosques for radiation levels has the Council on American Islamic Relations in an uproar. CAIR’s Ibrahim Hooper fumed: “This creates the appearance that Muslims are targeted simply for being Muslims. I don’t think this is the message the government wants to send at this time.”
New revelations that federal officials are checking mosques for radiation levels has the Council on American Islamic Relations in an uproar. CAIR’s Ibrahim Hooper fumed: “This creates the appearance that Muslims are targeted simply for being Muslims. I don’t think this is the message the government wants to send at this time.”
A CAIR statement claimed that the monitoring “could lead to the perception that we are no longer a nation ruled by law, but instead one in which fear trumps constitutional rights. All Americans should be concerned about the apparent trend toward a two-tiered system of justice, with full rights for most citizens, and another diminished set of rights for Muslims.”
Indeed, the mainstream media has made much of potential Constitutional issues, trumpeting the fact that the radiation monitoring has been done without search warrants -- even though no actual searches have been carried out. Also, Justice Department spokesman Brian Roehrkasse maintained that “FBI agents do not intrude across any constitutionally protected areas without the proper legal authority,” and that it does not monitor groups in general but only acts on specific information. Is there any such information in this case? Roehrkasse spoke of official concern with “a growing body of sensitive reporting that continues to show al-Qaida has a clear intention to obtain and ultimately use chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear” weapons.
This has been public knowledge for years.
Not long after 9/11, Americans discovered plans for constructing nuclear weapons in a former Al-Qaeda safe house in Kabul. A 2003 CIA report stated that jihad terrorists “have a wide variety of potential agents and delivery means to choose from for chemical, biological and radiological or nuclear (CBRN) attacks.” Other reports have claimed that Osama bin Laden himself met with Pakistani nuclear scientists; that Al-Qaeda has already obtained nuclear material on the Russian black market, and that jihadists already having brought those nukes into the United States. Others asserted that Al-Qaeda was planning to smuggle nuclear material into the U.S. from Mexico. But even if none of that is true, there is no doubt that jihadists are working in that direction. Ramzi bin al-Shibh, one of the masterminds of 9/11, has declared that “in killing Americans…Muslims should not exceed four million non-combatants, or render more than ten million of them homeless.”
Entire article here : http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.asp?ID=20699
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
